2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-2312(02)00494-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech recognition with spiking neurons and dynamic synapses: a model motivated by the human auditory pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This precise temporal pattern in spiking activity is considered as a crucial coding strategy in sensory information processing areas [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] and neural motor control areas in the brain [25], [26]. SNNs have become the focus of a number of recent applications in many areas of pattern recognition such as visual processing [27], [28], [29], [30], speech recognition [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], and medical diagnosis [38], [39]. In recent years, a new generation of neural networks that incorporates the multilayer structure of DNNs (and the brain) and the type of information communication in SNNs has emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This precise temporal pattern in spiking activity is considered as a crucial coding strategy in sensory information processing areas [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] and neural motor control areas in the brain [25], [26]. SNNs have become the focus of a number of recent applications in many areas of pattern recognition such as visual processing [27], [28], [29], [30], speech recognition [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], and medical diagnosis [38], [39]. In recent years, a new generation of neural networks that incorporates the multilayer structure of DNNs (and the brain) and the type of information communication in SNNs has emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several models have also attempted to reproduce, to some extent, the structure of the visual cortex [64,15,47,55], as well as an earlier version of this model [43], on which our work is based. Not many neural models have been proposed for the auditory process [39,61], and little is yet known about the kind of brain computations that lead to word recognition there. Recently, [27] addressed the important issue of the roles and the interactions between ITC (Inferior Temporal Cortex) and PFC (Pre-Frontal Cortex) in categorization, with a neural model, which was again limited to vision without any relation to words.…”
Section: Computational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les poids k des canaux en ordre croissant, de 1 à 24, sont donc : 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 3,4,2,7,6,9,14,13,15,20,17,19,18,16,11,12 En observant les résultats de la reconnaissance (tableau A.4), il est surprenant de voir qu'un grand pourcentage des prononciations est classé correctement (79 %). De plus, les résultats obtenus avec le cinquième locuteur (mpe), non utilisés pour la création des modèles, sont de l'ordre de 90 %.…”
Section: A 15 Exempleunclassified