2019
DOI: 10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-18-0519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech Perception Skills of Children With Speech Sound Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Purpose The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether preschool- and early school–age children with speech sound disorders (SSDs) have difficulties with speech perception. Method Systematic searching of 8 electronic databases identified 73 eligible studies across 71 articles examining the speech perception skills of children with SSDs. The findings and methodological characteristics of each study were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the categories of speech perception assessment presented by Hearnshaw et al (2019), there was evidence of differences in performance between children with and without CP±L in: discrimination of minimal and repeated contrast non-word pairs (Finnegan 1974), categorical perception of a specific minimal pair (Whitehill et al 2003) and a sound indication task (Lemos and Feniman 2010). No evidence was found for differences between groups on phonological awareness tasks (rhyme and alliteration awareness) meeting the inclusion criteria of a speech input processing task for this review (Anderson et al 2016, Collett et al 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the categories of speech perception assessment presented by Hearnshaw et al (2019), there was evidence of differences in performance between children with and without CP±L in: discrimination of minimal and repeated contrast non-word pairs (Finnegan 1974), categorical perception of a specific minimal pair (Whitehill et al 2003) and a sound indication task (Lemos and Feniman 2010). No evidence was found for differences between groups on phonological awareness tasks (rhyme and alliteration awareness) meeting the inclusion criteria of a speech input processing task for this review (Anderson et al 2016, Collett et al 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could have implications for the incorporation of these skills into assessment and intervention plans. Locke (1980a) proposed that speech input processing assessment should centre on the specific speech errors that children produce and Hearnshaw et al (2019) reported that children with non-cleft-related SSD had difficulties with speech input processing of sounds they produced in error in 86% of 30 relevant studies included in their review. Therefore, this aspect of speech input processing appears to warrant further investigation in children born with CP±L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 A systematic review of children with SSD ages 3;0 to 8;2 found that the majority of them presented with speech perception difficulties. 8 In addition, a recent study of the perception of medial consonants of children ages 4;0 to 5;11 found that all participants with SSD obtained lower speech perception scores than the children with typical speech. 9 Examination of the types of speech errors produced by a child with SSD is not sufficient to determine what underlying difficulties may be present.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Of Children With Ssdsmentioning
confidence: 98%