2022
DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2140830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech-language pathologists’ perspectives of dysphagia following reperfusion therapies: An Australian mixed-methods study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of this study was not to analyse different dysphagia screening methods, and we cannot exclude the possibility that other screening methods have better screening performance than SSA for this specific population of patients. In a recent study of stroke patients undergoing MT and/or thrombolysis, the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) identified dysphagia in about 90% of patients in the first 72 h after reperfusion therapy, 9 which could suggest a better sensitivity for this screening method. However, this study had a small study population ( n = 26), and no comprehensive clinical or instrumental swallowing assessment which could serve as a reference for the analysis of the screening performance of GUSS was available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The goal of this study was not to analyse different dysphagia screening methods, and we cannot exclude the possibility that other screening methods have better screening performance than SSA for this specific population of patients. In a recent study of stroke patients undergoing MT and/or thrombolysis, the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) identified dysphagia in about 90% of patients in the first 72 h after reperfusion therapy, 9 which could suggest a better sensitivity for this screening method. However, this study had a small study population ( n = 26), and no comprehensive clinical or instrumental swallowing assessment which could serve as a reference for the analysis of the screening performance of GUSS was available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 There are few studies addressing the frequency and characteristics of dysphagia and the performance of dysphagia screening tests in this group of patients, and there are still open questions related to the optimal strategy of swallowing assessment. 8,9 Current international guidelines for the diagnosis of post-stroke dysphagia recommend a detailed dysphagia assessment for stroke patients who fail a dysphagia screen and for patients who present risk factors for post-stroke dysphagia. 10 A detailed dysphagia assessment, including comprehensive clinical swallowing assessment and instrumental swallowing assessment, allows not only to identify the presence of dysphagia and the risk of aspiration, but is also able to further characterize the type and severity of dysphagia and to provide dietary recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the limited understanding of the continuum of dysphagia recovery following EVT and thrombolysis, management pathways for dysphagia are unclear for SLPs and the wider medical team. A 2022 mixed-methods survey of 62 Australian SLPs found inconsistencies in the management of dysphagia following reperfusion therapies across Australia, with SLPs also reporting various changes in dysphagia presentation in the acute stage post-stroke [ 12 ]. Dysphagia was reported to be more fluctuant following EVT and/or thrombolysis, resulting in increased need for repeat clinical swallowing assessment, as well as a reduced incidence rates of dysphagia of a moderate severity [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2022 mixed-methods survey of 62 Australian SLPs found inconsistencies in the management of dysphagia following reperfusion therapies across Australia, with SLPs also reporting various changes in dysphagia presentation in the acute stage post-stroke [ 12 ]. Dysphagia was reported to be more fluctuant following EVT and/or thrombolysis, resulting in increased need for repeat clinical swallowing assessment, as well as a reduced incidence rates of dysphagia of a moderate severity [ 12 ]. Dysphagia was reported to be severe in cases of unsuccessful reperfusion therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%