2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking deaf children with cochlear implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, some of our older children appear to have longer training periods (Table 1). Our finding was in line with previous studies in which older children with cochlear implants tended to score higher on tonal-language performance (Huang et al, 2005;Lee & van Hasselt, 2005). At least partly, this could also be attributed to the aforementioned influence of auditory plasticity.…”
Section: Effect Of Age and Duration Of Cochlear Implant Use On Pitch supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Actually, some of our older children appear to have longer training periods (Table 1). Our finding was in line with previous studies in which older children with cochlear implants tended to score higher on tonal-language performance (Huang et al, 2005;Lee & van Hasselt, 2005). At least partly, this could also be attributed to the aforementioned influence of auditory plasticity.…”
Section: Effect Of Age and Duration Of Cochlear Implant Use On Pitch supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Peng et al [5] reported that the subjective judgment scores of tone production of the cochlear implant children were negatively correlated with the age at implantation. Huang et al [19] showed a trend of negative correlation between the tone intelligibility and the age at implantation. However, the correlation did not reach the statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Huang et al (2005) found recognition by adult listeners of the tones of implanted children's productions of Mandarin words in isolation at less than 60%, and of the words themselves at less than 20%. It appears that the limited capacity of cochlear implants to effectively provide fundamental frequency information seriously impedes early implantees from learning to perceive, and produce, lexical tone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%