2020
DOI: 10.22210/suvlin.2020.090.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech errors and articulatory gestures: an electropalatographic investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the experimenter and the participant can be faced away from each other and the experimenter can operate the participant's screen and EPG equipment remotely from a safe distance of more than one metre. For example, the CROCO corpus was recorded in such a way that the experimenter and the participant wearing a cochlear implant performed a modified map task and the participant was unable to see the experimenter (Liker et al., 2019). The primary purpose of this set up was to facilitate a communicative situation which would draw participants’ attention away from the laboratory environment or experimental context and to immerse themselves in their task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the experimenter and the participant can be faced away from each other and the experimenter can operate the participant's screen and EPG equipment remotely from a safe distance of more than one metre. For example, the CROCO corpus was recorded in such a way that the experimenter and the participant wearing a cochlear implant performed a modified map task and the participant was unable to see the experimenter (Liker et al., 2019). The primary purpose of this set up was to facilitate a communicative situation which would draw participants’ attention away from the laboratory environment or experimental context and to immerse themselves in their task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%