2009
DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2008.2005342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech Enhancement, Gain, and Noise Spectrum Adaptation Using Approximate Bayesian Estimation

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents a new approximate Bayesian estimator for enhancing a noisy speech signal. The speech model is assumed to be a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) in the log-spectral domain. This is in contrast to most current models in frequency domain. Exact signal estimation is a computationally intractable problem. We derive three approximations to enhance the efficiency of signal estimation. The Gaussian approximation transforms the log-spectral domain GMM into the frequency domain using minimal Kull… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our method with four traditional denoising approaches. "Spectral Subtraction" stands for speech enhancement by spectral subtraction [1], "LSA" means using a minimum mean-square error log-spectral amplitude estimator [9], "ML" is a method based on maximum likelihood estimator [10] and "MAP" denotes for an approach based on maximum a posteriori estimation [11]. To be worthy of attention, we degrade these methods' performances by letting them to estimate the noise by using only the first fifteen frames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method with four traditional denoising approaches. "Spectral Subtraction" stands for speech enhancement by spectral subtraction [1], "LSA" means using a minimum mean-square error log-spectral amplitude estimator [9], "ML" is a method based on maximum likelihood estimator [10] and "MAP" denotes for an approach based on maximum a posteriori estimation [11]. To be worthy of attention, we degrade these methods' performances by letting them to estimate the noise by using only the first fifteen frames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This performance parameter is defined as below in terms of spectral coefficients of the input signal and estimated signal (Hao et al 2009). …”
Section: Sdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such methods include independent component analysis [2], non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) [3]- [5], and K-SVD [6]. However, these always require particular features or prior training for supervised separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%