2011 IEEE 7th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cspa.2011.5759904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech enhancement based on spectral subtraction in wavelet domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spectral subtraction method is one of the most popular methods for reducing the background noise [2] . In this method only an estimate of noise is needed for speech enhancement.…”
Section: (B) Spectral Subtraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spectral subtraction method is one of the most popular methods for reducing the background noise [2] . In this method only an estimate of noise is needed for speech enhancement.…”
Section: (B) Spectral Subtraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimate of noise spectrum is subtracted from the noisy speech spectrum to obtain cleaned speech at the output. Wavelet thresholding is another method of denoising the speech signal but it is not successfully implemented for background noise [2]reduction. In this paper a new hybrid method of speech enhancement is proposed in which first we take the wavelet transform of noisy speech signal that yields Approximation and detail coefficients at level 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of far-end noise on speech signal can be tackled by using traditional noise suppression algorithms like minimum mean-square error (MMSE), short-time spectral amplitude (STSA) estimator [18], spectral subtraction methods [20], etc. The approaches proposed for far-end noise reduction techniques discussed in the literature [18][19][20] are not suitable in the present context as they focus on mitigating noise at the speaker end rather than at the receiver end.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches proposed for far-end noise reduction techniques discussed in the literature [18][19][20] are not suitable in the present context as they focus on mitigating noise at the speaker end rather than at the receiver end. Near-end noise cannot be influenced because the listener is located in a noisy environment, and the noise reaches the ears with hardly any possibility to suppress [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The far-end noise scenario is tackled by traditional noise suppressing algorithms like minimum mean-square error (MMSE) short-time spectral amplitude (STSA) estimator [1], adaptive filtering algorithms [2,3], spectral subtraction methods [4,5], etc. For near-end noise, signal cannot be influenced because the listener is located in the noisy environment and the noise reaches the ears with hardly any possibility to intercept [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%