Psychological Evaluation of the Developmentally and Physically Disabled 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1995-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech and Language Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because aberrant and/or idiosyncratic behaviors evidently differ from pre-linguistic forms of communication, which constitute precursors of linguistic forms of reference and communication in typical speech-language acquisition, they should perhaps be labeled and treated differently and more tentatively interpreted as forms of communication. Thus, when it comes to describing the socio-pragmatic functions of individuals with such extreme communicative restrictions, it may be best to refer to such behaviors as “potential communicative acts” (as suggested by Sigafoos, Woodyatt, Keen, et al, 2000 ) instead of non-symbolic or pre-linguistic forms of communication ( Didden et al, 2010; Siegel-Causey & Guess, 1989; von Tetzchner et al, 1996 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because aberrant and/or idiosyncratic behaviors evidently differ from pre-linguistic forms of communication, which constitute precursors of linguistic forms of reference and communication in typical speech-language acquisition, they should perhaps be labeled and treated differently and more tentatively interpreted as forms of communication. Thus, when it comes to describing the socio-pragmatic functions of individuals with such extreme communicative restrictions, it may be best to refer to such behaviors as “potential communicative acts” (as suggested by Sigafoos, Woodyatt, Keen, et al, 2000 ) instead of non-symbolic or pre-linguistic forms of communication ( Didden et al, 2010; Siegel-Causey & Guess, 1989; von Tetzchner et al, 1996 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%