2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-017-3064-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech Acts During Friends’ and Non-friends’ Spontaneous Conversations in Preschool Dyads with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder versus Typical Development

Abstract: In this study, we videotaped two 10-min. free-play interactions and coded speech acts (SAs) in peer talk of 51 preschoolers (21 ASD, 30 typical), interacting with friend versus non-friend partners. Groups were matched for maternal education, IQ (verbal/nonverbal), and CA. We compared SAs by group (ASD/typical), by partner's friendship status (friend/non-friend), and by partner's disability status. Main results yielded a higher amount and diversity of SAs in the typical than the ASD group (mainly in assertive a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each complete, intelligible utterance was given a pragmatic code based on its communicative function. The pragmatic coding scheme was based on Dore (1974), Chapman (1981, as cited in Hoff, 2013), and Bauminger-Zviely et al (2017. The following communicative functions were included for this project: asserting, requesting, information seeking, answering, calling, greeting/politeness forms, protesting, conversational maintenance, dubbing, nonreciprocal/other, and repeating.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each complete, intelligible utterance was given a pragmatic code based on its communicative function. The pragmatic coding scheme was based on Dore (1974), Chapman (1981, as cited in Hoff, 2013), and Bauminger-Zviely et al (2017. The following communicative functions were included for this project: asserting, requesting, information seeking, answering, calling, greeting/politeness forms, protesting, conversational maintenance, dubbing, nonreciprocal/other, and repeating.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the boy's likelihood of responding to non-reciprocal friends was significantly greater than his likelihood of responding to friends, and that his responses to non-reciprocal friends and non-friends alike activated joint engagement, whereas responses to friends did not. These results, which are partially consistent with previous findings, highlight the significant friend vs. non-friend differences in the frequency and variety of speech acts (Bauminger et al, 2017). Although non-friend and non-reciprocal friend interactions may be a factor of stress and anxiety and may pose a higher social challenge for children with HFASD than interactions with friends, it is possible that this stress and anxiety could decrease as the relationship develops .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the social interaction of people with autism has been a central area of research in this field for decades , we are still a long way from understanding precisely what these individuals understand by friendship, what conditions are most favorable for children with autism to establish and maintain friendship relations, and what characteristics define these relationships . Most of what we know is based on clinical criteria and evaluations and on the analysis of self-reports and reports by relatives, teachers, or caregivers, and few observational studies have been carried out to date in natural contexts (Bauminger et al, 2008;Bauminger, Golan, & Tubul, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations