ERWP 2012
DOI: 10.24148/wp2008-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speculative Growth, Overreaction, and the Welfare Cost of Technology-Driven Bubbles

Abstract: This paper develops a general equilibrium model to examine the quantitative effects of speculative bubbles on capital accumulation, growth, and welfare. A near-rational bubble component in the model equity price generates excess volatility in response to observed technology shocks. In simulations, intermittent equity price run-ups coincide with positive innovations in technology, investment and consumption booms, and faster trend growth, reminiscent of the U.S. economy during the late 1920s and late 1990s. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As originally noted by Basu (1987), the functional form of the capital law of motion (4) implies a direct link between the market value of equity and firms' investment in physical capital. This feature of the model is consistent with the observed lowfrequency comovement between the real S&P 500 stock market index and real business investment in recent decades, as documented by Lansing (2012).…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As originally noted by Basu (1987), the functional form of the capital law of motion (4) implies a direct link between the market value of equity and firms' investment in physical capital. This feature of the model is consistent with the observed lowfrequency comovement between the real S&P 500 stock market index and real business investment in recent decades, as documented by Lansing (2012).…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The nonlinear formulation of equation (4) reflects the presence of capital adjustment costs. 3 Lansing (2012) shows that the Cobb-Douglas form of Equation (4) can be viewed as a log-linearized version of the nonlinear law of motion for capital employed by Jermann (1998). 4 Following Cassou and Lansing (1997) and Lansing and Markiewicz (2018), I allow for a "capital law multiplier shock" v t that evolves as a stationary AR(1) process with persistence parameter ρ v and innovation variance σ 2 ε,v .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling Variation in cov[Dlog(z t ), x t ] Affects the Real-time Learning Paths 15Lansing (2009) considers the welfare cost of speculative overreaction in a production economy with endogenous long-run consumption growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples along these lines includeAmbler and Paquet (1994), Justiniano, Primiceri, and Tambalotti (2010), Waggoner and Zha (2011), and Furlanetto and Seneca (2014.9Lansing (2012) shows that equation (11) with h2;t = 0 maps directly to a log-linear approximate version of the law of motion for capital employed byJermann (1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%