1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60418-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
184
0
20

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
184
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1965, Good presented an early exposition on the topic within the modern field of computer science [15]. Good specifically proposed an "intelligence explosion" in which intelligent machines make successively more intelligent machines until they are much smarter than humans, which would be "the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control" [15] (p. 33). This intelligence explosion is one use of the term technological singularity, though the term can also refer to wider forms of radical technological change [16].…”
Section: Superintelligence and Its Skepticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1965, Good presented an early exposition on the topic within the modern field of computer science [15]. Good specifically proposed an "intelligence explosion" in which intelligent machines make successively more intelligent machines until they are much smarter than humans, which would be "the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control" [15] (p. 33). This intelligence explosion is one use of the term technological singularity, though the term can also refer to wider forms of radical technological change [16].…”
Section: Superintelligence and Its Skepticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the first ultra-intelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control. (Good, 1965) Accordingly, Good was a "champion" and influential at the highest governmental, academic and corporate levels with crossover theoretical interests from Bayesian mathematics to computer programming design and manufacturing to film consultancy. Moreover, he was careful not to take an over-optimistic line on the controllability of AI unless -as he wrote -"docility" could be built into the resulting technology.…”
Section: Interactive or Crossover Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) names milestones in biological evolution such as the emergence of eukaryotes, vertebrates, amphibians, mammals, primates, hominidae, and Homo sapiens, which show an accelerating trend. Following Good (1965) and Bostrom (to appear), Muehlhauser and Salamon (this volume), Arel (this volume), and Schmidhuber (this volume) describe developments in machine learning which seek to demonstrate that progressively more 'intelligent' problems have been solved during the past few decades, and how such technologies may further improve, possibly even in a recursive process of selfmodification. Some authors attempt to show that many of the above accounts of acceleration are in fact manifestations of an underlying law of nature (Adams 1904;Kurzweil 2005, Chaisson this volume): quantitatively or qualitatively measured, acceleration is commonly visualized as an upwards-curved mathematical graph which, if projected into the future, is said to be leading to a discontinuity.…”
Section: Towards a Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from an 'intelligence explosion' (Good 1965): a process in which software-based intelligent minds enter a 'runaway reaction' of self-improvement cycles, with each new and more intelligent generation appearing faster than its predecessor. Part I of this volume is dedicated to essays which argue that progress in artificial intelligence and machine learning may indeed increase machine intelligence beyond that of any human being.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%