Spectrum sharing mechanisms in the unlicensed band: Performance limit and comparison

Abstract

Deploying networks in unlicensed spectrum has been drawing significant attention, which serves to alleviate the increasing demands in licensed spectrum. However, the network coexistence in unlicensed channel may lead to throughput degradation and unfairness. An appropriate spectrum‐sharing mechanism is therefore of great significance. In this paper, we study the performance limit of two representative mechanisms used in the coexistence with WiFi, including Duty Cycle (DC) and Listen‐Before‐Talk (LBT). In particular, both the throughputs of the coexisting network and WiFi under two mechanisms are derived as explicit expressions of system parameters, based on which the maximum total throughput of the coexisting network and WiFi is characterized under throughput fairness and 3GPP fairness, respectively. A systematic comparison between the optimal throughput performance of DC and LBT is conducted. It is found that if the coexisting network with LBT occupies the channel for a large period each time it successfully accesses the channel, then the maximum total throughput in LBT would be close to that in DC under both throughput fairness and 3GPP fairness. The optimal settings for DC and LBT mechanisms to achieve maximum total throughput are obtained, respectively, which sheds important light on the design of fair and efficient spectrum‐sharing protocols.