2007
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrum of the Laplace operator and periodic geodesics: thirty years after

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of the "classical versus quantum" relation between the length spectrum and the Laplace spectrum via trace formulae and Poisson relations (see e.g., [12,21]), Theorem 1.1 above can be viewed as a classical counterpart of a well-known result of Brascamp and Lieb stating that the first eigenvalue of the Dirichlet Laplace operator on bounded convex domains satisfies a Brunn-Minkowski type inequality, see [6].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the "classical versus quantum" relation between the length spectrum and the Laplace spectrum via trace formulae and Poisson relations (see e.g., [12,21]), Theorem 1.1 above can be viewed as a classical counterpart of a well-known result of Brascamp and Lieb stating that the first eigenvalue of the Dirichlet Laplace operator on bounded convex domains satisfies a Brunn-Minkowski type inequality, see [6].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem (1) follows directly from this: if the area A and perimeter P are given then the angles are determined by equation (7) and the Proposition, so the triangle is determined up to dilation. Then the given area fixes the dilation factor.…”
Section: A Theorem About Trianglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S is the action of a closed orbit of time t, 1/ det is the one-loop approximation to the functional integral, and ν is the Morse index of the orbit (the number of unstable directions). See for example chapter 17 of [8], or the reviews [10,14] for precise formulas.…”
Section: Brief Review Of the Trace Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%