2018
DOI: 10.1109/mgrs.2018.2832057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrum Management and Its Importance for Microwave Remote Sensing [Technical Committees]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review serves as a reference for future work on the implementation of the most suitable RFI mitigation scheme for an air-borne or space-borne SAR system. in low-frequency bands like P and L band [3]. Figure 1 illustrates observed RFI cases from different frequency bands spreading over the global area [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review serves as a reference for future work on the implementation of the most suitable RFI mitigation scheme for an air-borne or space-borne SAR system. in low-frequency bands like P and L band [3]. Figure 1 illustrates observed RFI cases from different frequency bands spreading over the global area [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ref. , 28 GHz band is proposed for Earth Stations in Motion (ESIM) remote sensing and International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT) standards which are relevant to microwave remote sensing. Our proposed antenna covers this band and can be used as an image sensor in IMT standards and ESIM remote sensing applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A First Conference Preparatory Meeting (CPM-1) is held to coordinate the work on the agenda items among six Study Groups of the ITU-R, which carry out technical studies with the contribution of the ITU Member States and Sector Members. Approximately six months before the WRC, a Second Conference Preparatory Meeting (CPM-2) takes place to consolidate the technical input for all study groups into one CPM Report that will then be used as a guideline in making decisions at the WRC [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%