Spectrum-Averaged Cross-Section Measurement of¹⁰³Rh(n, n′)^103mRh in the²⁵²Cf Fission Neutron Spectrum

Validation of IRDFF in252Cf Standard and IRDF-2002 Reference Neutron Fields

“…1: SPA with the Scale method PFNS gives systematically higher C/E below 2 MeV, lower between 2 and 8 MeV, and essentially higher above 10 MeV, where C/E shows a different overall trend, than with ENDF/B-VII.1. However, the spread of experimental SPA for the high-threshold (n,2n) reactions on 127 I, 55 Mn, 59 Co, 63 Cu, 19 F, 89 Y, 90 Zr and 58 Ni (all have E 50% between 11 and 15 MeV) is also large.…”

“…8. The experimental reaction cross sections were taken from EXFOR and checked against original publications [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] (they were not corrected for modern monitors or decay data). Some experimental data are spectral indices, i.e.…”

Measurement of cross sections of threshold detectors with spectrum average technique

“…In the literature, although there are many studies in which fission neutron spectrum [1][2][3] and 7 Li( p, n) 7 Be, T( p, n) 3 He, D(d, n) 3 He and T(d, n) 4 He are used for the measurement of neutron cross sections for the 103 Rh(n, n ) 103m Rh, 115 In(n, n ) 115m In, 232 Th(n, f ), 47 Ti(n, p) 47 Sc, 64 Zn(n, p) 64 Cu, 58 Ni(n, p) 58 Co, 54 Fe(n, p) 54 Mn, 46 Ti (n, p) 46 Sc, 27 Al(n, p) 27 Mg, 56 Fe(n, p) 56 Mn, 24 Mg(n, p) 24 Na, 59 Co(n, α) 56 Mn, 27 Al(n, α) 24 Na and 48 Ti(n, p) 48 Sc threshold detectors, it is not possible to find a study where (α, n) neutron spectrum is used, except for the study done by Çelenk and Bayar [26].…”