1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.20.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopy of Odd-Odd Nuclei with Direct (d, α) Reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 Table L contains VAP distributions corresponding to predominantly L =2 transfers for J = l states (0.71 MeV in 30 P and 0.46 MeV in 38 K) and J = 3 states The L values can be determined from the differential cross section. 14 The data show distinctly different oscillatory patterns for different J transfers, but similar patterns for the same J transfers, and agree reasonably well with the appropriate DWBA calculations for the reaction 32 S^,«) 30 P. Figure 2(c) contains results for L =4 tranfers. The reaction 28 Si(i,a) 26 Al(g.s.)…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Figure 2 Table L contains VAP distributions corresponding to predominantly L =2 transfers for J = l states (0.71 MeV in 30 P and 0.46 MeV in 38 K) and J = 3 states The L values can be determined from the differential cross section. 14 The data show distinctly different oscillatory patterns for different J transfers, but similar patterns for the same J transfers, and agree reasonably well with the appropriate DWBA calculations for the reaction 32 S^,«) 30 P. Figure 2(c) contains results for L =4 tranfers. The reaction 28 Si(i,a) 26 Al(g.s.)…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In regions of considerable configuration mixing, we generally expect J 0^+ and ^even" levels to be reached by a mixture of two L {L-J-l and L'-J + 1) values. 7 The correlation between calculated and observed levels is further suggested by the relative intensities of the L transfer. For example, calculations 8 based on the configuration mixed wave functions of Kuo indicate intense L = 3 dominance over L = 1 for exciting the 0.267-MeV level, while L = 1 should be dominant for the 0.633-MeV level, even though both states are J ir = 2~.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%