1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00213474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopy of laboratory plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of diagnostic experiments described above (and not discussed in the original publication) were used as a basis for the estimation and subsequent elimination of the usual causes of asymmetry, discussed above (see also Baker 1977). The only effect predicting asymmetries of the magnitude and type observed was the interference asymmetry predicted by Burgess (1968).…”
Section: Quantum Interference Asymmetriesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of diagnostic experiments described above (and not discussed in the original publication) were used as a basis for the estimation and subsequent elimination of the usual causes of asymmetry, discussed above (see also Baker 1977). The only effect predicting asymmetries of the magnitude and type observed was the interference asymmetry predicted by Burgess (1968).…”
Section: Quantum Interference Asymmetriesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The first reported observations of the quantum interference asymmetry predicted by Burgess (1968) were made on this source, and were reported briefly in an earlier publication (Baker and Burgess 1977). The lines of Ar 111 multiplet 1 uv, and Ar 11 multiplet 6 4806 and 4848 A all showed marked asymmetries, with enhanced blue wings, which could not be explained by any of the conventional causes of asymmetry (e.g.…”
Section: Quantum Interference Asymmetriesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As one example, the simple expression V = Ze /R, , suggested by Burgess and Peacock (1971), was used to obtain the curve shown in the figure. Burgess (1972) (Burgess and Peacock, 1971;Van Zandt et al, 1976;Pittman and Kelleher, 1980), and it is not yet certain if even the form jf Eq. 22is correct.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%