1993
DOI: 10.1021/j100118a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopy of C-H stretching vibrations of gas-phase butenes: cis-2-butene, trans-2-butene, 2-methyl-2-butene, and 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four absorption bands dominate both spectra: the asymmetric methyl deformation (δ as (CH 3 ) at 1450 cm -1 ), the CdC stretching (ν(CdC) at 1605 cm -1 ), and the symmetric and asymmetric C-H stretching of the terminal methyl groups (ν s (CH 3 ) and ν as (CH 3 ) at 2860 and 2915 cm -1 , respectively). [100][101][102][103] The presence of the carbon-carbon double bond vibration at 1605 cm -1 in particular attests to the previous conclusion concerning the molecular nature of cis-2-butene adsorption on the oxide surface. In fact, adsorption of butene may be relatively weak, since the CdC double bond does not undergo the strong sp 3 rehybridization due to formation of a di-σ bonded complex typically seen for alkenes on metal surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four absorption bands dominate both spectra: the asymmetric methyl deformation (δ as (CH 3 ) at 1450 cm -1 ), the CdC stretching (ν(CdC) at 1605 cm -1 ), and the symmetric and asymmetric C-H stretching of the terminal methyl groups (ν s (CH 3 ) and ν as (CH 3 ) at 2860 and 2915 cm -1 , respectively). [100][101][102][103] The presence of the carbon-carbon double bond vibration at 1605 cm -1 in particular attests to the previous conclusion concerning the molecular nature of cis-2-butene adsorption on the oxide surface. In fact, adsorption of butene may be relatively weak, since the CdC double bond does not undergo the strong sp 3 rehybridization due to formation of a di-σ bonded complex typically seen for alkenes on metal surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Guo and Madix 16 ascribed the absence of hydrogenation of the various alkenes they studied on Pd (100) to the strong hydrogen adsorption on that surface. Similarly, the weakening of metal-hydrogen bonds in the presence of coadsorbates was invoked to explain the promotion of alkene hydrogenation on both a Ni-precovered Pt(111) surface [28][29][30] and on a Fe (100) surface predosed with CO. 31,32 Zaera has suggested that the first half-hydrogenation to alkyl species may be the rate-limiting step in alkene hydrogenation, and that the β-hydride elimination then competes favorably against the reductive elimination step with coadsorbed hydrogen that leads to alkane production. 33,34 More recently, the thermal chemistry of alkenes has been studied in our group on more realistic model catalysts consisting of Pd nanoparticles supported on Al 2 O 3 /NiAl(110) oxide films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature observed at 872 cm -1 is assigned to ν 16 , the C−C in plane stretch between the methyl group and the first allyl carbon. The observed frequency is in good agreement with similar frequencies observed for the H 3 C−C stretch in the 2-methylallyl radical (865 cm -1 ), cis −2-butene (870 cm -1 ), trans -2-butene (863 cm -1 ), eclipsed 1-butene (836 cm -1 ), and gauche 1-butene (854 cm -1 ) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The vibrational frequencies for the 1-methylallyl radical correlate with experimental values obtained for the allyl radical, , the 2-methylallyl radical, methyl formate, and propenal . The vibrational frequencies are compared with the eclipsed and gauche conformations of 1-butene, trans -1,3-butadiene, and the two isomeric forms of butene in Table 1 Vibrational Assignments for the 1-Methylallyl Radical assignmentab-initio 6-31G* (90% corr)1-methylallyl radical, this work2-methylallyl radical a allyl radical b methyl formate c propenal c A‘ ν 1 CH 2 asym stretch 3092 3107 3103 ν 2 CH asym stretch 3015 3028 ν 3 CH 2 sym stretch 3013 3051 3000 ν 4 CH sym stretch 3003 2943 2800 ν 5 CH 3 asym stretch 2949 3045 ν 6 CH 3 sym stretch 2873 2969ν 7 CH 3 deform (asym) 1482 1454 ν 8 CH 2 scissor (sym) 1478 1492 1492 1488 1420 ν 9 CH asym bend 1449 ν 10 CH 3 deform (sym) 1403 1392 1445 ν 11 CH ip sym, bend 1305 1265 1275 ν 12 CCC asym stretch 1219 1184 ν 13 CCC sym stretch 1132 1037 1066 ν 14 CH 3 -C−C asym str 1077 ν 15 CH 2 ,CH 3 rock (sym) 960 912 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation