1976
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/9/12/034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopy at very high pressures. X. Use of ruby R-lines in the estimation of pressure at ambient and at low temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter served to estimate the applied pressure to the sample from the shift of the R 1 fluorescence line. Hydrostatic pressure conditions were monitored by checking the separation of the R 1 and R 2 lines and their half-width [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter served to estimate the applied pressure to the sample from the shift of the R 1 fluorescence line. Hydrostatic pressure conditions were monitored by checking the separation of the R 1 and R 2 lines and their half-width [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is the basis (when calibrated [16,20,21,25]) for ruby pressure measurement in the DAC and other high-pressure experiments, and which provides insight into the origin of the pressure proportionality constant Π = (2Π + Π ). Both Π and Π are usually positive and hence pressure decreases the fluorescence energy (or increases the wavelength of the fluorescent light [16,20]).…”
Section: Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 1970s, the process was turned around somewhat, and the details of crystal field theory were overtaken by empirical advances. In particular, calibrated experimental determination of shifts in the R1 and R2 line energies, , as a function of hydrostatic pressure [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] became the standard method for measuring pressure in high-pressure experiments involving the diamond anvil cell (DAC)-a method that continues to this day [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], although not without debate regarding calibration coefficients. (Here and throughout, citations within a topic are given in chronological order of publication.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41] Chai and Brown 42 point out that the R2 line is insensitive to nonhydrostatic pressures, while the R1 is. One might consider using the R2 line; however, R1 and R2 lines are thermalized and at liquid helium temperatures only the R1 fluoresces.…”
Section: A Rubymentioning
confidence: 99%