Multipole moments such as charge,
dipole, and quadrupole are often
invoked to rationalize intermolecular phenomena, but a low-order multipole
expansion is rarely a valid description of electrostatics at the length
scales that characterize nonbonded interactions. This is illustrated
by examining several common misunderstandings rooted in erroneous
electrostatic arguments. First, the notion that steric repulsion originates
in Coulomb interactions is easily disproved by dissecting the interaction
potential for Ar2. Second, the Hunter-Sanders model of
π–π interactions, which is based on quadrupolar
electrostatics, is shown to have no basis in accurate calculations.
Third, curved “buckybowls” exhibit unusually large dipole
moments, but these are ancillary to the forces that control their
intermolecular interactions, as illustrated by two examples involving
corannulene. Finally, the assumption that interactions between water
and small anions are dictated by the dipole moment of H2O is shown to be false in the case of binary halide–water
complexes. These examples present a compelling case that electrostatic
explanations based on low-order multipole moments are very often counterfactual
for nonbonded interactions at close range and should not be taken
seriously in the absence of additional justification.