1974
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210260158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic properties of Tb3+ ions in YAlO3 crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This set of Stark levels was compared with levels reported by others for TbAlO 3 [15][16][17][18][19]. In 7 F 6 , Stark levels Z 1,2 , Z 4 , Z 5 , Z 7 , Z 8 , Z 9 , Z 12 and Z 13 are in reasonable agreement with published levels.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This set of Stark levels was compared with levels reported by others for TbAlO 3 [15][16][17][18][19]. In 7 F 6 , Stark levels Z 1,2 , Z 4 , Z 5 , Z 7 , Z 8 , Z 9 , Z 12 and Z 13 are in reasonable agreement with published levels.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The different crystal-field splitting schemes for the 7 F J manifolds proposed by Sekita et al [15,16] and Joubert et al [17] for TbAlO 3 , and Arsenev et al [18] and Berg [19] for Tb 3+ in YAlO 3 , attest to the difficulties in making Stark-level assignments to the energy levels of Tb 3+ in the low symmetry site. While each manifold is split into 2J+1 non-degenerate Stark levels in C s symmetry, there exist Stark levels having nearly the same energy (quasi-doublets) within a manifold that are spectroscopically difficult to resolve.…”
Section: Analyses Of Spectroscopic Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6, the values in brackets are the results for Tb:YAlO 3 reported by Arsenev, Bienert, and Potemkin. 13 A considerable discrepancy for the splitting of the 7 F 5 multiplet can be seen. They reported the results only so that it is not possible to know how they constructed the Stark splitting scheme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%