1999
DOI: 10.1086/301033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic Monitoring of Comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake) with the JCMT and IRAM Radio Telescopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
75
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best-fit temperature variation followed a power law in R h of −2.0 (T rot = T 1AU R h −2.0 ± 0.2 , with T 1AU = (93 ± 3) K representing the fitted value extrapolated to R h = 1 AU; see Figure 3). Although our measurements sample a relatively small range of R h , this power law is consistent with "typical" values for other comets (e.g., see Biver et al 1997Biver et al , 1999.…”
Section: Rotational Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best-fit temperature variation followed a power law in R h of −2.0 (T rot = T 1AU R h −2.0 ± 0.2 , with T 1AU = (93 ± 3) K representing the fitted value extrapolated to R h = 1 AU; see Figure 3). Although our measurements sample a relatively small range of R h , this power law is consistent with "typical" values for other comets (e.g., see Biver et al 1997Biver et al , 1999.…”
Section: Rotational Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our best-fit results indicate a rather steep increase in water production with decreasing heliocentric distance (Q H2O = Q 1AU R h −4.7 ± 0.9 , with Q 1AU = (6.66 ± 1.55) × 10 28 s −1 ; Figure 3(B)), which is somewhat steeper than the typical (insolation-limited) value (R h −2 ) often seen in comets (Biver et al 1999). A steeper power law could be related to an increase in outgassing associated with (slow) nucleus rotation during this brief interval.…”
Section: Production Ratesmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For T rot = 100 K, the abundance ratio limit is ∼4-6%. Our limit on CO production in GZ is similar to the estimated abundance of CO in the nucleus of Comets 1P/Halley (3.5%, Eberhardt 1998), Bradfield (C/1979 Y1) (3.5%, Feldman et al 1997), and Levy (C/1990 K1) (4.1-8.4%, Feldman et al 1997), and is significantly lower than the estimated CO abundances in comets Hyakutake (C/1996 B2) (∼14%, McPhate et al 1996; ∼20%, Biver et al 1999b;Mumma et al 1996 derived a preliminary value of 7%) and Hale-Bopp (∼10% at r ∼ 1 AU, according to Weaver et al 1999 andDiSanti et al 1999; ∼23% at r ∼ 1 AU, according to Biver et al 1999a). The CO abundance limit for GZ is somewhat larger than the abundance ratio observed in Comet Austin (C/1989 X1) (1.7%, Feldman et al 1997) and the upper limits derived for 103P/Hartley 2 (≤1.2%, Weaver et al 1994) and Shoemaker-Levy (C/1991 T2) (≤1.8%, Feldman et al 1997).…”
Section: Cosupporting
confidence: 76%
“…f C 2 H 6 /CH 3 OH: using Q CH 3 OH from Bockelée-Morvan et al (1995), except for Hyakutake (Biver et al 1999b), Hale-Bopp (Biver et al 1999a), and GZ (this work); for GZ, C 2 H 6 /H 2 O ≤ 0.05-0.08% and C 2 H 6 /CH 3 OH ≤ 5.9% from our high resolution data (see Table II). …”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 68%