2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic evaluation of the nutrient value of ground beef patties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the differences observed in estimation accuracy of the quality attributes of raw and cooked fillets, a comparison with other literature results was not possible because no NIR applications have been made on cooked fish samples (at least to the authors' knowledge). A similar analysis was reported by Bajwa, Kandaswamy, and Apple (2009) for beef meat patties: these authors attributed the lower accuracy obtained for cooked samples to cooking loss. As regards this parameter, please note that the estimate obtained in the present study could not be considered satisfactory, even if its accuracy was higher than that reported in other studies (by Prevolnik, Čandek-Potokar, & Škorjanc, 2010, on intact pork meat samples, for example).…”
Section: Cooked Freeze-dried Filletssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Despite the differences observed in estimation accuracy of the quality attributes of raw and cooked fillets, a comparison with other literature results was not possible because no NIR applications have been made on cooked fish samples (at least to the authors' knowledge). A similar analysis was reported by Bajwa, Kandaswamy, and Apple (2009) for beef meat patties: these authors attributed the lower accuracy obtained for cooked samples to cooking loss. As regards this parameter, please note that the estimate obtained in the present study could not be considered satisfactory, even if its accuracy was higher than that reported in other studies (by Prevolnik, Čandek-Potokar, & Škorjanc, 2010, on intact pork meat samples, for example).…”
Section: Cooked Freeze-dried Filletssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Prieto and others () successfully employed NIR spectroscopy to discriminate between ground beef samples from steers and young cattle based on their chemical composition. Bajwa and others () used visible NIR (Vis/NIR) spectroscopy in order to predict the nutrient quality of ground beef patties. ElMasry and others () used a HSI system to assess the quality of cooked turkey hams and ElMasry and others () successfully used HSI to assess major constituents in beef (water, fat, and protein).…”
Section: Meat Analysis Over the Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009, Bajwa et al 55 demonstrated that cholesterol content and total calories in raw beef could be predicted by visible-nIr spectroscopy in the 350-1075 nm region. In this experiment, prediction accuracies for nIr-based models of raw beef patties (r 2 = 0.80 and 0.96 for cholesterol content and total calories, respectively, with associated SEP values of 15.0 mg g −1 and 0.19 Kcal g −1 ) were compared to those for the cooked counterparts (r 2 = 0.79 and 0.87 for cholesterol content and total calories respectively with associated SEP figures of 6.2 mg g −1 and 0.07 Kcal g −1 ).…”
Section: Other Chemical Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%