1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01932.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic classification of X-ray selected stars in the rho Ophiuchi star-forming region and vicinity

Abstract: We present intermediate‐resolution (FWHM∼1.5–2.6 Å) optical spectra of 106 candidate optical counterparts of 77 X‐ray sources detected in four pointed (texp ≥ 8700 s) ROSAT PSPC observations of the ρ Ophiuchi star‐forming region and vicinity. Using the spectral types and equivalent widths of Hα and Li iλ670.8 nm obtained from our spectra, we applied spectroscopic criteria in order to classify our sample in different pre‐main‐sequence subtypes: ‘classical’ T Tauri stars (CTTS); ‘weak’ T Tauri stars (WTTS), and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
58
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Oph, all our low-mass objects lie within a $35 0 ; 35 0 area of the dark core originally studied by Casanova et al (1995). We select K0-M4 stars in this region from Bouvier & Appenzeller (1992) and Martín et al (1998). For Taurus, we select stars from Briceño et al (2002) and Luhman et al (2003a) (since most of our Taurus low-mass objects lie in the Taurus fields analyzed in these two studies).…”
Section: Accretion and (Sub)stellar Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Oph, all our low-mass objects lie within a $35 0 ; 35 0 area of the dark core originally studied by Casanova et al (1995). We select K0-M4 stars in this region from Bouvier & Appenzeller (1992) and Martín et al (1998). For Taurus, we select stars from Briceño et al (2002) and Luhman et al (2003a) (since most of our Taurus low-mass objects lie in the Taurus fields analyzed in these two studies).…”
Section: Accretion and (Sub)stellar Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, for Upper Sco we select stars from the studies by Walter et al (1994) and Preibisch et al (1998Preibisch et al ( , 2002, which together provide the most complete list of stars with available H data in this cluster to date. We have then compiled H equivalent widths for all these stars from various sources in the literature (mostly low resolution, but high resolution in a handful of cases where low-resolution data are unavailable; Oph, Bouvier & Appenzeller 1992;Martín et al 1998;Taurus, Hartmann et al 1991;Hartigan et al 1994;Martín et al 1994;Mathieu 1994;Kenyon et al 1998;Monin et al 1998;Briceño et al 1998Briceño et al , 1999White & Hillenbrand 2004;IC 348, Luhman et al 2003b;Cha I, Luhman 2004;Upper Sco, Walter et al 1994;Preibisch et al 1998Preibisch et al , 2002 and applied the BM03 accretion criteria.…”
Section: Accretion and (Sub)stellar Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…]Different dividing lines between nonaccreting weak-line T Tauri (WTT) stars and classical T Tauri (CTT) stars have been proposed, but it makes little difference to the classifications in these cases. SR 21 (0.54 in absorption:Martin et al 1998) and T Cha (2-A 10 :Gregorio-Hetem et al 1992; Alcala et al 1995) are nominallẙ A WTT stars, although T Cha is highly variable and close to the cutoff.LkHa 330 (11-20 : Fernandez et al 1995;Cohen & Kuhi 1979) A and HD 135344 (17.4 :Acke et al 2005) are clearly CTT stars. A 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Levreault 1988; (2)Cohen & Kuhi 1979; (3)Fernandez et al 1995; (4) Hartigan et al 1994; (5) D'Alessio et al 2005; (6) Kenyon et al 1998; (7) Reipurth & Pettersson 1993; (8) Sahu & Sahu 1992; (9) Lawson et al 1996; (10) Hartmann et al 1998; (11) Appenzeller et al 1983; (12) Reipurth et al 1996; (13) Saffe et al 2003; (14) Hartigan 1993; (15) van den Ancker et al 1998; (16) Alcala et al 1995; (17) Gregorio-Hetem et al 1992; (18) Sartori et al 2003; (19) Hughes & Hartigan 1992; (20) Hughes et al 1994; (21) Heyer & Graham 1989; (22) Prato et al 2003; (23) Bouvier & Appenzeller 1992; (24) Luhman & Rieke 1999;(25)Martin et al 1998; (26) Rydgren 1980; (27) Gomez de Castro 1997; (28) Natta et al 1997; (29) Finkenzeller & Mundt 1984; (30) Acke et al 2005; (31)The et al 1994; (32) Thi et al 2001; (33) Houk 1982; (34) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%