2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-018-1260-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectropolarimetric Observations of Solar Noise Storms at Low Frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the above, we verified the presence/absence of radio burst activities using data obtained with GLOSS, GRASP, and e‐CALLISTO also. Observations with the GRIP were particularly useful to verify the presence/absence of discrete sources of weak nonthermal emission like noise storm continuum on any given day via their circularly polarized radio emission and accordingly select the GRAPH data (see, e.g., McCauley et al, 2019; Mugundhan et al, 2018; Ramesh et al, 2011). Note that observations with a correlation radio interferometer with mutually perpendicular linearly polarized antennas as in GRIP are sensitive for circular polarization measurements (see, e.g., Thompson et al, 2001).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above, we verified the presence/absence of radio burst activities using data obtained with GLOSS, GRASP, and e‐CALLISTO also. Observations with the GRIP were particularly useful to verify the presence/absence of discrete sources of weak nonthermal emission like noise storm continuum on any given day via their circularly polarized radio emission and accordingly select the GRAPH data (see, e.g., McCauley et al, 2019; Mugundhan et al, 2018; Ramesh et al, 2011). Note that observations with a correlation radio interferometer with mutually perpendicular linearly polarized antennas as in GRIP are sensitive for circular polarization measurements (see, e.g., Thompson et al, 2001).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all active regions that are productive at other wavelengths produce noise storms, and the non-radio signatures are often scant (Willson, 2005;Iwai et al, 2012;Li et al, 2017), unlike Type II and III bursts, which have obvious associations with CMEs and flares (Cairns et al, 2003;Reid and Ratcliffe, 2014). There is general agreement that both the burst and continuum components of noise storms are produced by plasma emission, largely due to their often high circular polarizations (Aschwanden, 1986;Mugundhan et al, 2018), but what accelerates the electrons is still debated. Small-scale reconnection events (Benz and Wentzel, 1981) or weak shocks associated with upwardpropagating waves (Spicer, Benz, and Huba, 1982) are the two leading ideas, and recent work has favored persistent interchange reconnection between open and closed fields at the boundaries of active regions (Del Zanna et al, 2011;Mandrini et al, 2015) or reconnection driven by moving magnetic features (Bentley et al, 2000;Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: Active Region Noise Storm Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patches of bright emission during the period ≈05:09 -05:11 UT are typical of type I or noise storm bursts from the solar corona (see for e.g. Iwai et al (2013); Mugundhan et al (2018b)). It is widely believed that the bursts are due to plasma radiation at the fundamental plasma frequency (Melrose 1980;Kai et al 1985).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%