2015
DOI: 10.2166/wqrjc.2017.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrophotometric monitoring of nitrite in seawater after liquid microextraction of its derivative with 2,3-diaminonaphthalene

Abstract: A simple dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplets coupled with spectrophotometric detection was developed for the determination of nitrite in Chabahar Bay seawater. In the preparation procedure, 2,3-diaminonaphthalene as derivatization reagent reacts with nitrite in acidic medium to form a photometric center of 1-[H]-naphthotriazole (NAT). Product material (NAT) was extracted by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with 1-dodecanol as extraction solvent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, several analytical methods were used so far for determination and quantification of nitrite including spectrophotometry, Griess method, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, ion chromatography, Chemiluminescence, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and UV/Vis detector but each of them possess its own disadvantages such as expensive, long time process and large quantity required. [19][20][21][22][23][24] On the other hand, electrochemical method offers low cost, short response time, easy preparation and fabrication, high sensitivity and selectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, several analytical methods were used so far for determination and quantification of nitrite including spectrophotometry, Griess method, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, ion chromatography, Chemiluminescence, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and UV/Vis detector but each of them possess its own disadvantages such as expensive, long time process and large quantity required. [19][20][21][22][23][24] On the other hand, electrochemical method offers low cost, short response time, easy preparation and fabrication, high sensitivity and selectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%