2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrophotometric method for optical band gap and electronic transitions determination of semiconductor materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The bandgaps estimated using the Tauc plot method in some cases significantly deviated from those obtained through the CoW method. Methods to determine the electronic transition type as suggested by Sangiorgi et al (2017) for use in the Tauc plot method failed. 46 While complex absorption spectra for LDHs have been observed in the past 19,22,43,45 , few have made attempts at explaining deviations from clean absorption edges.…”
Section: Bandgap Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bandgaps estimated using the Tauc plot method in some cases significantly deviated from those obtained through the CoW method. Methods to determine the electronic transition type as suggested by Sangiorgi et al (2017) for use in the Tauc plot method failed. 46 While complex absorption spectra for LDHs have been observed in the past 19,22,43,45 , few have made attempts at explaining deviations from clean absorption edges.…”
Section: Bandgap Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cano-Casanova et al [40] concluded that the higher the composition of anatase phase in TiO2 nanocrystals, the lower the Eg values of respective TiO2. In fact, N. Sangiorgi et al [39] further strengthen the hypothesis by correlating the Eg values with lattice parameters, polycrystalline, amorphous phases and grain boundaries. Thus, the addition of AA to TiO2 nanocrystals contributed to the alteration of TiO2 crystallographic features and shifted the range of absorption into the visible region.…”
Section: Fig 3 Druv-vis Plot Of All Tio2 Nanocrystals A) Abs Vs Wamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To limit possible errors in the estimation of band gap energy (Eg), the values of Kubelka-Munk function F(R) were directly recorded from the DRUV-vis spectroscopy. Meanwhile, the usual practice is by converting the reflectance data (%R) into absorption mode as reported by several researchers [37][38][39]. Then, it will be plotted in Kubelka-Munk plot, [(F(R).hυ] 1/n vs hυ where n = 2 for indirect transition and n = ½ direct transition.…”
Section: Fig 3 Druv-vis Plot Of All Tio2 Nanocrystals A) Abs Vs Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the bandgap of a powder sample using the diffuse reflectance spectrophotometer is a common technique [56]. So, in this study the band-gap energy is calculated using a Kubelka-Munk method [57] based on the equation below:…”
Section: Analysis Of Diffuse Reflectance Uv-vis Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%