2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2018.8378669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrally-efficient FM noise radar waveforms optimized in the logarithmic domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the spectral efficiencies are approximately 0.23, 0.43, 0.69, and 0.80, respectively. These values are also the inverse of "oversampling" factor K when performing optimization of discretized FM waveforms [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Super-gaussian Spectral Templatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, the spectral efficiencies are approximately 0.23, 0.43, 0.69, and 0.80, respectively. These values are also the inverse of "oversampling" factor K when performing optimization of discretized FM waveforms [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Super-gaussian Spectral Templatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been shown [10,11] that imposing structure to RFM can provide a Gaussian spectral density in the expectation (over the set of unique waveforms), yielding a per-waveform peak sidelobe level (PSL) of ~10 log10 (B3dBT) after expectation, for 3-dB bandwidth B3dB and pulse width T. Better sidelobe performance can be achieved by optimizing each waveform to match the desired spectrum density (e.g. [12][13][14][15][16][17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [43] (with detailed derivation in [44]) gradient-descent optimisation was performed and subsequently demonstrated experimentally to realise waveforms that can reach a lower bound on sidelobe performance for discretised FM waveforms. This general approach was also employed to optimise coded FM waveforms based on Legendre polynomials [45] (and also account for receiver range straddling), to efficiently incorporate spectral notches into FM waveforms [46], to realise an intermodulation-based formulation for non-linear harmonic radar [47], and to design different sub-classes of random FM waveforms [36,37]. Here gradient descent is used to optimise subsets of complementary FM waveforms.…”
Section: Complementary Fm Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting attribute of random FM waveforms is that their inherent diversity enables the prospect of complementary sidelobe cancellation based on appropriate filtering of arbitrary non-repeating waveforms (such as those described in [33,[35][36][37][38]). Specifically, work by Bi and Rohling [13] on mismatched filters (MMFs) for sets of binary codes has recently been generalised [39] to permit application to random FM waveforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costas coding), discrete phase modulation (e.g. Barker and Franck coding) [20], and frequency and/or phase modulation by optimization [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%