2013
DOI: 10.1214/11-aop734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral statistics of Erdős–Rényi graphs I: Local semicircle law

Abstract: We consider the ensemble of adjacency matrices of Erdős-Rényi random graphs, that is, graphs on N vertices where every edge is chosen independently and with probability p ≡ p(N ). We rescale the matrix so that its bulk eigenvalues are of order one. We prove that, as long as pN → ∞ (with a speed at least logarithmic in N ), the density of eigenvalues of the Erdős-Rényi ensemble is given by the Wigner semicircle law for spectral windows of length larger than N −1 (up to logarithmic corrections). As a consequence… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
487
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(500 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(105 reference statements)
13
487
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, λ N are the eigenvalues of H. Theorem 1.1 implies that .17) with probability at least 1 − e −ξ log ξ . Following a standard application of the Helffer-Sjöstrand functional calculus along the lines of [20,Section 8.1], the following result may be deduced from (1.17). …”
Section: Corollary 12 (Eigenvector Delocalization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, λ N are the eigenvalues of H. Theorem 1.1 implies that .17) with probability at least 1 − e −ξ log ξ . Following a standard application of the Helffer-Sjöstrand functional calculus along the lines of [20,Section 8.1], the following result may be deduced from (1.17). …”
Section: Corollary 12 (Eigenvector Delocalization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induction in the proof of Theorem 1.1 is not a continuity (or bootstrapping) argument, as used e.g. in the works [19][20][21] on local laws of models with independent entries. The multiplicative steps η → η/2 that we make are far too large for a continuity argument to work, and we correspondingly obtain much weaker a priori estimates from the induction hypothesis.…”
Section: This Impliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof is almost the same as the discussion on pages 2311-2312 in [10]. For the convenience of the reader, we sketch it below.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 24mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For the convenience of the reader, we sketch it below. At first, according to the discussion below (4.28) in [10], for any ı, j = 1, . .…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 24mentioning
confidence: 99%