Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral shape-based assessment of SDOF nonlinear response to real, adjusted and artificial accelerograms

Abstract: The simple study discussed in this paper compared different procedures to obtain sets of spectral matching accelerograms for nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures in terms of inelastic seismic response. Six classes of records were considered: original (unscaled) real records, real records moderately linearly scaled, real records significantly linearly scaled, real records adjusted by wavelets, artificial accelerograms generated by two different procedures. The study is spectral shape-based, that is, all the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each damage states considered, two pairs of seven linearly scaled accelerograms are selected through Rexel 3.5 software (Iervolino et al, 2010b), see Figure 7. Spectral compatibility with the two target spectra of the area is considered according to EC8 selection criteria, and limiting the scaling factor up to 2 (Iervolino et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Analysis Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each damage states considered, two pairs of seven linearly scaled accelerograms are selected through Rexel 3.5 software (Iervolino et al, 2010b), see Figure 7. Spectral compatibility with the two target spectra of the area is considered according to EC8 selection criteria, and limiting the scaling factor up to 2 (Iervolino et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Analysis Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of nonlinear time-history analysis sets of three or at least seven accelerograms can be considered if the demand is evaluated as the maximum of the set or as the mean of the sets respectively (see Iervolino et al 2010a). In EC8 part 3 (CEN, 2005), for existing buildings, linear analysis (both static and dynamic) are allowed considering the elastic spectral acceleration or the elastic spectrum without the application of any reduction factor and applying these methods according to a displacement-based approach (it means that verification of ductile mechanisms should be based on deformations).…”
Section: Analysis Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear scaling procedure of the accelerograms does not affect the response given the spectral restraint provided by code's prescriptions (see [35] for details). Ground motion sets are composed of seven pairs of accelerograms, each one corresponding to North-South and East-West components of the same record.…”
Section: Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rexel 3.5 software [36] is employed for the selection of spectrumcompatible accelerograms. Linear amplitude scaling procedure is employed to reduce dispersion of accelerograms' elastic spectra with respect to the target code spectra [35]. Accelerograms are selected from the European Strong Motion Database (ESD, http://www.isesd.hi.is/), in a range of magnitude (M) 6 to 7.5, and a range of epicentral distances (R) 0 to 50 km.…”
Section: Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is based on the LHS technique and it is presented schematically in Significant dispersion was observed on the structural response with the use of different natural records (Iervolino et. al, 2009), while the implementation of artificial accelerograms tends to underestimate seismic response (Iervolino et. al, 2010).…”
Section: Fault Area Magnitude Relation Epistemic Magnitude Uncertaintmentioning
confidence: 99%