2010
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral reflectance from a soybean canopy exposed to elevated CO2 and O3

Abstract: By affecting the physiology and structure of plant canopies, increasing atmospheric CO2 and O3 influence the capacity of agroecosystems to capture light and convert that light energy into biomass, ultimately affecting productivity and yield. The objective of this study was to determine if established remote sensing indices could detect the direct and interactive effects of elevated CO2 and elevated O3 on the leaf area, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic capacity of a soybean canopy growing under field con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the correlations between PRI and RUE for different types of vegetation can be due to differences in the canopy structure and shadow fraction, however, when the canopy is detected from only one angle (as with MODIS) [4], highlighting the importance of the effect of the canopy structure on PRI. PRI was also sensitive to changes in the structure and physiology during the soybean growing season caused by elevated CO 2 and O 3 concentrations [127]. Canopy PRI values were higher during the growth phase than other phases [83,129] and did not efficiently track RUE variability during the ripening stage [129].…”
Section: Canopy Levelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in the correlations between PRI and RUE for different types of vegetation can be due to differences in the canopy structure and shadow fraction, however, when the canopy is detected from only one angle (as with MODIS) [4], highlighting the importance of the effect of the canopy structure on PRI. PRI was also sensitive to changes in the structure and physiology during the soybean growing season caused by elevated CO 2 and O 3 concentrations [127]. Canopy PRI values were higher during the growth phase than other phases [83,129] and did not efficiently track RUE variability during the ripening stage [129].…”
Section: Canopy Levelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Structural changes of the canopy caused by sustained water stress [120,123,125,126] or a varying leaf area index (LAI) [127] over the season led to PRI variability and loss of the seasonal relationship between PRI and RUE. PRI calculated from pure crown reflectance for fruit trees under different irrigation regimes varied with xanthophyllic pigment contents and not with vegetation structure or chlorophyllic content [128].…”
Section: Canopy Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, projected environmental changes in water, nutrient, temperature, CO 2 , ultraviolet radiation, ozone and pathogens will negatively influence growth and induce an onset of the senescence process, independent of the natural recourse of leaf senescence [27] [28] [29] [30]. Therefore, the analysis or diagnosis of the physiological status of plants is a complex process involving several components that differ with respect to time and kinetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, all four conditions are modulated by NDVI values greater than 0.6 units in order to avoid background and/or cloud contamination that usually have high values of reflectance. Also, saturation effects of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) when Leaf Area Index (LAI) is greater than 3 can mask water stress [31].…”
Section: Rcda Development: How Does That Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%