1987
DOI: 10.1070/im1987v029n01abeh000965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Properties of Generic Dynamical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Lemma 1.2. This is a strengthening of Lemma 3.9 of [K] (see also [St,Theorem 3 / z"'dp -* ak{l) ■ ■ ■ ak(i) and / z"'dp -* ak,{l) ■ ■ ■ ak,{¡l),…”
Section: Spectral Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Proof of Lemma 1.2. This is a strengthening of Lemma 3.9 of [K] (see also [St,Theorem 3 / z"'dp -* ak{l) ■ ■ ■ ak(i) and / z"'dp -* ak,{l) ■ ■ ■ ak,{¡l),…”
Section: Spectral Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…He proved that automorphisms T and S are isomorphic provided that their Cartesian powers T ×d and S ×d (for some d ≥ 1) are isomorphic and T is α-weakly mixing. This result, taking into account that α-weak mixing is generic [17], gives therefore the positive answer to (1) for a typical automorphism. In [16] Ryzhikov and Troitskaya strengthened the result from [14] by replacing α-weak mixing with the existence of a polynomial in the weak closure of time automorphisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The first observation from [24] can be formulated in the following form: if mixing Z-action is not multiple mixing, then its spectral measure is not disjoint from the convolution a * a. This shows a connection of Kolmogorov's problem on group property of spectrum (see [6]- [8], [19]) with the multiple mixing problem.…”
Section: F(f| | D=(p(f| Gmentioning
confidence: 99%