2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9202592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Properties of Clipping Noise

Abstract: One serious disadvantage of any multicarrier-modulation technique such as orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is its high peak-to-average-power ratio (PAPR) which might lead to signal clipping in several scenarios. To maximize the transmit data rate, it is important to take this non-linear distortion into account. The most common approach is based on the Bussgang theorem, which splits the distortion in a correlated part, represented by a linear damping factor, and uncorrelated additive noise. How… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We empirically deduce that the EVM of the quantized and clipped oversampled signal can be obtained from the EVM of the signal sampled at Nyquist rate by a shift of about -5 dB. The reason of the performance improvement achieved by the oversampled signal is due to the fact that the clipping and quantization noise spreads over the whole bandwidth [8], which corresponds to non-null subcarrier at Nyquist rate, but both null and non-null subcarrier if OSR > 1. The noise power per subcarrier is then reduced for oversampled signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We empirically deduce that the EVM of the quantized and clipped oversampled signal can be obtained from the EVM of the signal sampled at Nyquist rate by a shift of about -5 dB. The reason of the performance improvement achieved by the oversampled signal is due to the fact that the clipping and quantization noise spreads over the whole bandwidth [8], which corresponds to non-null subcarrier at Nyquist rate, but both null and non-null subcarrier if OSR > 1. The noise power per subcarrier is then reduced for oversampled signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The clipping noise based on the usual method has been largely studied in the literature and well reviewed in [8]. Thus, assuming that the real and imaginary parts of W c k are i.i.d., and denoting by f n the standard normal distribution, then by using [8]-( 9) we obtain…”
Section: B Evm Analysis For the Usual Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where |xn| 2 E{|xn| 2 } is the square modulus of the normalized signal. The main drawback of clipping is to induce non-linear distortions, which can be modeled as an additional white Gaussian noise [24]. The method hereby presented aims at reducing based on the maximum likelihood criterion is hereby presented.…”
Section: B Clipping Driven Chirp Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worth indicating that papers like [5,6] consider the complex amplitude of the signal, whereas [7][8][9] consider the amplitude of the real or imaginary part of the signal. Numerous papers and overviews deal with the errors generated by quantization [10], clipping [5][6][7][8][9], or both [11]. However, most of the papers consider the usual quantization and clipping method applied to inphase and quadrature components separately.…”
Section: Computer Floating-point Precision Integer Precision Rf Front...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the clipping is a well known method in OFDM as it is is applied to reduce the peak to average power ratio (PAPR) of the signal [5,6]. However, it is worth indicating that papers like [5,6] consider the complex amplitude of the signal, whereas [7][8][9] consider the amplitude of the real or imaginary part of the signal. Numerous papers and overviews deal with the errors generated by quantization [10], clipping [5][6][7][8][9], or both [11].…”
Section: Computer Floating-point Precision Integer Precision Rf Front...mentioning
confidence: 99%