1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80280-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral pattern recognition of improved voice quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies do not seem to support these findings, since most authors consider the principal predictions of breathy voice to be presence of aspiration noise [2,25,33,66], together with energy losses and gains in various spectral zones [9,67].…”
Section: Acoustic Correlates Of Vocal Qualitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies do not seem to support these findings, since most authors consider the principal predictions of breathy voice to be presence of aspiration noise [2,25,33,66], together with energy losses and gains in various spectral zones [9,67].…”
Section: Acoustic Correlates Of Vocal Qualitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Mean, maximum and minimum F0 were computed for the speech samples and part of the monkey samples as previously described (52). Due to the noise, 'commanding', 'angry', and 'frightened' samples could not be automatically analysed.…”
Section: Acoustic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In monkeys, the audible spectrum may extend beyond 30 kHz (56). For the visualisation of differences in the overall distribution of spectral energy, selforganised maps were computed (30,35,52) using spectral features from the initial 150 ms of the signal (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Acoustic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOMs have been used to characterize several aspects of normal and disordered voice. In a series of studies carried out by Leinonen and colleagues (Leinonen, Hiltunen, Kangas, Juvas, & Rihkanen, 1993;Leinonen, Kangas, Torkkola, & Juvas, 1992;Rihkanen, Leinonen, Hiltunen, & Kangas, 1994), a SOM was trained to detect characteristics of dysphonic voice by recognition of spectral composition. To determine how this map would characterize disordered voice, samples were taken from individuals classified with varying degrees of dysphonia using a method derived from the GRBAS perceptual rating scale (Hirano, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%