2016
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral modelling for passive scalar dynamics in homogeneous anisotropic turbulence

Abstract: The present work aims at developing a spectral model for a passive scalar field and its associated scalar flux in homogeneous anisotropic turbulence. This is achieved using the paradigm of eddy-damped quasi-normal markovian (EDQNM) closure extended to anisotropic flows. In order to assess the validity of this approach, the model is compared to several detailed DNS and experiments of shear-driven flows and isotropic turbulence with a mean scalar gradient at moderate Reynolds numbers. This anisotropic modelling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, for Saffman turbulence α = −6/5 and for Batchelor turbulence α = −1.38. A similar extension was done recently for a passive scalar field [13,44] in Batchelor turbulence. These exponents for the velocity field are gathered in Table 2 and are referred to as Classical CBC exponents since they are valid in HIT.…”
Section: Decay Laws For K(t) and R 13 (T)mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Basically, for Saffman turbulence α = −6/5 and for Batchelor turbulence α = −1.38. A similar extension was done recently for a passive scalar field [13,44] in Batchelor turbulence. These exponents for the velocity field are gathered in Table 2 and are referred to as Classical CBC exponents since they are valid in HIT.…”
Section: Decay Laws For K(t) and R 13 (T)mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Note that other anisotropic descriptors for scalar fields exist [19], and that for an isotropic state sin 2 γ = 2/3 unlike b 33 .…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical results obtained with such an approximation were thoroughly discussed in the previously mentioned references and compared quantitatively well with both DNS and experiments, in various configurations, from axisymmetric contractions, expansions, and plane distortions [1,3], to the transport of a passive scalar field in the presence of a mean gradient with a variable Prandtl number [2,14], along with the case of unstably stratified turbulence [4]. However, for shear flows, the model could not recover accurately the anisotropy distribution by investigating, for instance, several components of the global indicator b ij = u i u j /2K − δ ij /3, where K = ∞ 0 E(k) dk is the kinetic energy, nor the asymptotic value of the kinetic exponential growth rate γ as said earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This expansion was further truncated at the second order for the sake of simplicity in [1]: the immediate drawback is the loss of angular anisotropic information which makes the production terms, linear with the mean-velocity gradient matrix A ln , not exact anymore. The consequences of such an approximation were thoroughly examined and discussed in several references [1][2][3], so that they are not further argued here. The aim of this study is precisely to improve the modelling of anisotropy through a truncation at the next even order, the fourth-one, in Section 3.…”
Section: The E-z Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation