2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2002.00547.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral karyotyping and interphase FISH reveal abnormalities not detected by conventional G‐banding

Abstract: Seventy uniformly treated children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia were analysed for chromosomal abnormalities with conventional G-banding, spectral karyotyping (SKY) and interphase fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) using probes to detect MLL, BCR/ABL, TEL/AML1 rearrangements and INK4 locus deletions. Numerical and/or structural changes could be identified in 80% of the patients by the use of molecular cytogenetic techniques, whereas abnormalities could be detected in 60% of the patients using G-bandi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(63 reference statements)
4
42
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Mitelman database of chromosome aberrations in cancer, 26 only four such translocations have previously been described in childhood ALL. [15][16][17]30 Interestingly, three of these cases were ETV6/RUNX1 positive. 16,17,30 None of these abnormalities had been identified by G-banding; hence, it is possible that, owing to the similar banding pattern of the involved chromosome arms in combination with the poor banding quality often found in childhood ALL, der(6)t(X;6) and der(11)t(X;11) may go undetected unless specifically looked for by FISH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the Mitelman database of chromosome aberrations in cancer, 26 only four such translocations have previously been described in childhood ALL. [15][16][17]30 Interestingly, three of these cases were ETV6/RUNX1 positive. 16,17,30 None of these abnormalities had been identified by G-banding; hence, it is possible that, owing to the similar banding pattern of the involved chromosome arms in combination with the poor banding quality often found in childhood ALL, der(6)t(X;6) and der(11)t(X;11) may go undetected unless specifically looked for by FISH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 To the best of our knowledge, only eight ETV6/RUNX1-positive ALLs with partial Xq gains, as identified by metaphase CGH or multicolor FISH, have been described. [15][16][17][27][28][29] All the gains in these cases were generated through unbalanced translocations involving Xq, none of which were seen by conventional cytogenetics. Notably, all cases with Xq gain in the present study were males, as were six of the previously published cases; 16,17,[27][28][29] the gender of the remaining two cases was not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The power of the SKY technique was again demonstrated when stratified cohorts of childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemias (B-ALLs) with more than 150 patients were re-evaluated subsequently to chromosome banding (Elghezal et al, 2001;Mathew et al, 2001;Nordgren et al, 2002). Twelve of 70 ALL patients showed prognostically unfavourable chromosomal aberrations that were missed before (Nordgren et al, 2002).…”
Section: Molecular Cytogenetic Diagnostics and Research In Leukemias mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing line of evidence shows that the p16 INK4a deletion heralds poor prognosis of the disease [7]. Detection of the p16 INK4a deletion needs incorporation of a molecular cytogenetic approach such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as the deletion may be submicroscopic [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%