1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1971.tb01567.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral intensity in some Scottish freshwater lochs

Abstract: In the course of investigations on the ecology of submerged aquatic macrophytes a narrow-bandwidth spectroradiometer has been used to measure underwater spectral intensity (390-750 nm) in a series of lochs approaching the extremes in optical and chemical properties of Scottish fresh waters. Cosine response and immersion-effect properties of the collector were determined in the laboratory with a colUmated hght source. Diffuse attenuation coefficients, Fe, ranged from 0-55 in Loch Croispol, a calcareous loch, to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although various fishes are known to have visual pigments that maximize sensitivity to ambient environmental light (Levine & MacNichol, 1979;Munlz & Mouat, 1984;Heinermann & Ali, 1985), little is known of the vision of immature aquatic insects. Although it can be assumed that the vision of aquatic insects is matched to their photic environment, which in organically enriched freshwaters is shifted towards the red (James & Birge, 1938;Schindler, 1971;Spence, Campbell & Chrystal, 1971;Muntz & Mouat, 1984;Howard-Williams & Vincent, 1985;Reimchen, 1989), this idea has not been tested. This is a report on a behavioural study of the sensitivity of mayfly nymphs to red (650 nm) and infra-red (950 nm) light, the results being discussed in terms of experimental methodology and photic adaptation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various fishes are known to have visual pigments that maximize sensitivity to ambient environmental light (Levine & MacNichol, 1979;Munlz & Mouat, 1984;Heinermann & Ali, 1985), little is known of the vision of immature aquatic insects. Although it can be assumed that the vision of aquatic insects is matched to their photic environment, which in organically enriched freshwaters is shifted towards the red (James & Birge, 1938;Schindler, 1971;Spence, Campbell & Chrystal, 1971;Muntz & Mouat, 1984;Howard-Williams & Vincent, 1985;Reimchen, 1989), this idea has not been tested. This is a report on a behavioural study of the sensitivity of mayfly nymphs to red (650 nm) and infra-red (950 nm) light, the results being discussed in terms of experimental methodology and photic adaptation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prieur (1970) showed a decrease of quantum flux with depth from stations at Villefranche-sur-mer and sud Cap Ferrat, France . Spence et al (1971) calculated the number of quanta per 25 nm waveband from spectral irradiance data collected in two Scottish freshwater lochs . Kirk (1977a) demonstrated the attenuation and reflectance of down-welling quantum irradiance in various inland and coastal waters in south-eastern Australia .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of chlorophyll, DOM and suspended solids vary dramatically within short periods in most inshore waters and plankton blooms and variations in run-off cause unpredictable and extreme variations in spectral transmissions, and hence in the light available for vision. Freshwater is similarly changeable and can vary from extremely clear to green, yellow or brown, although some freshwaters such as Scottish tarns are so heavily stained with DOM that red light penetrates best (Spence et al, 1971) and in the blackwater tributaries of the Amazon far-red or even infra red wavelengths predominate (Muntz, 1978;Muntz and Mouat, 1984). Because of the extreme effect of filtering on the spectrum of light available for vision underwater, and the great variability in this spectral filtering in different waters, the study of the evolution of visual spectral sensitivity of animals living in different waters can be thought of as using the underwater environment as a 'natural laboratory' (Levine, 1982).…”
Section: Light Underwatermentioning
confidence: 98%