2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-016-0883-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Generalized Multi-dimensional Scaling

Abstract: Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a family of methods that embed a given set of points into a simple, usually flat, domain. The points are assumed to be sampled from some metric space, and the mapping attempts to preserve the distances between each pair of points in the set. Distances in the target space can be computed analytically in this setting. Generalized MDS is an extension that allows mapping one metric space into another, that is, multidimensional scaling into target spaces in which distances are eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods based on Multi‐Dimensional Scaling find correspondences by reembedding and then aligning shapes in a (possibly smaller) embedding space where the complexity is reduced [BBK06; ADK16]. [CK15] calculate a robust non‐rigid registration based on Markov random fields but cannot retrieve a continuous deformation which we do.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on Multi‐Dimensional Scaling find correspondences by reembedding and then aligning shapes in a (possibly smaller) embedding space where the complexity is reduced [BBK06; ADK16]. [CK15] calculate a robust non‐rigid registration based on Markov random fields but cannot retrieve a continuous deformation which we do.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional Maps. Our approach fits within the functional map framework, which was originally introduced in [OBCS*12] for solving non‐rigid shape matching problems, and extended significantly in follow‐up works, including [KBB*13, ADK16, KBBV15, RCB*17, EBC17, BDK17] among many others (see also [OCB*17] for an overview). The key observation in these techniques is that it is often easier to estimate correspondences between real‐valued functions, rather than points on the shapes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple follow‐up works aimed mainly at improving the stability and applicability of the framework; see [COC*17] for a survey. Notable extensions of functional maps include incorporation of sparsity‐based regularization [PBB*13], optimization on the manifold of orthogonal matrices [KBB*13, KGB16], design [ADK16] and tuning [COC14, LRR*17] of descriptors, correspondence between shape collections [HWG14, KGB16], partial correspondence [LRB*16,RCB*17], incorporation of descriptors through operators rather than least‐squares [NO17], use of adjoint operators to incorporate information about the reverse map [ERGB16, HO17], and regularization based on conserving products in addition to linear combinations [NMR*18]. Functional maps also have been combined with deep learning to learn how to extract dense correspondences [LRR*17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%