2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral evolution in gamma-ray bursts: Predictions of the internal shock model and comparison to observations

Abstract: Context. Several trends have been identified in the prompt gamma-ray burst (GRB) emission: e.g. hard-to-soft evolution, pulse width evolution with energy, time lags, and hardness-intensity and hardness-fluence correlations. Recently, Fermi has significantly extended the spectral coverage of GRB observations and improved the characterization of this spectral evolution. Aims. We want to study how internal shocks can reproduce these observations. In this model the emission comes from the synchrotron radiation of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(252 reference statements)
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While model checking can provide a qualitative guide to the validity of a spectra fit, other information should be used to fully justify the use of a model. These information can include physically motivated priors and predictions from time-evolving models such as those used in Dermer et al (1999); Pe'er (2008); Bošnjak & Daigne (2014). For example, Burgess et al (2016) from Dermer et al (1999) combined with synchrotron spectral fits to argue for an external shock interpretation of GRB 141028A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While model checking can provide a qualitative guide to the validity of a spectra fit, other information should be used to fully justify the use of a model. These information can include physically motivated priors and predictions from time-evolving models such as those used in Dermer et al (1999); Pe'er (2008); Bošnjak & Daigne (2014). For example, Burgess et al (2016) from Dermer et al (1999) combined with synchrotron spectral fits to argue for an external shock interpretation of GRB 141028A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burgess et al (2011)), which thus far have not addressed the possibility that spectral evolution might be associated with specific light curve elements within an individual pulse. Bošnjak & Daigne (2014) have considered the radiation mechanisms of kinematically evolving synchrotron shocks, but find that the model better explains observed pulse spectral evolution if (i) the distribution of shock-accelerated electrons is steeper than generally assumed, (ii) the peak energy dependence is reduced by altering microphysics parameters, (iii) the Lorentz factor undergoes more pronounced initial variations than previously thought, and (iv) the relativistic ejection proceeds with a constant mass flux rather than a constant kinetic energy flux. Bošnjak & Daigne (2014) indicate that these conditions are hard to justify, but that their ability to test microphysics conditions are limited by existing data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors afterwards [254][255][256][257][258][259][260][261][262][263][264] have used the motivated pulse profile of Willingale et al [108] for various studies on the prompt emission properties of the pulses.…”
Section: The -Correlation and Its Physical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%