2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021jb023142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Element Modeling of Acoustic to Seismic Coupling Over Topography

Abstract: Acoustic waves in the atmosphere are commonly recorded on seismometers as they couple into the ground. These signals, here called ground coupled airwaves, are not commonly considered in numerical modeling of infrasound propagation, which often assumes a rigid unmeshed boundary. Starting from an analytically‐tractable spherical wave model, we analyze how the coupling of an acoustic wave into a planar elastic halfspace changes over a wide range of scenarios. We use energy admittance to quantify acoustic to seism… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(226 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our forward modeling, we assume the boundary between the atmosphere and the ground to be flat. However, the ground surface topography affects the compliance (e.g., Bishop et al., 2021) by altering the guided infrasound horizontal wavenumber relative to the ground surface. To incorporate the topography into the compliance computation, we can compute the spatial wavenumber of the topography and combine the wavenumber with the one of guided infrasound, similar to the microseism studies which consider ocean waves coupling with topographic seafloors (e.g., Ardhuin et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our forward modeling, we assume the boundary between the atmosphere and the ground to be flat. However, the ground surface topography affects the compliance (e.g., Bishop et al., 2021) by altering the guided infrasound horizontal wavenumber relative to the ground surface. To incorporate the topography into the compliance computation, we can compute the spatial wavenumber of the topography and combine the wavenumber with the one of guided infrasound, similar to the microseism studies which consider ocean waves coupling with topographic seafloors (e.g., Ardhuin et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the accuracy of the DEM impacting the resultant numerical Green's functions, the FDTD method used here assumes a rigid boundary which may not 10.1029/2021JB023223 28 of 30 always be a good assumption (e.g. Bishop et al, 2021;Matoza et al, 2009). Numerical models that represent a smoothly varying topographic surface using stairstep boundaries may introduce spurious scattering into the modeled Green's functions (e.g., de Groot-Hedlin, 2004).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topographic features are known to diffract infrasonic waves and change the waveform significantly (e.g., Kim and Lees, 2011;Kim et al, 2015;Lacanna and Ripepe, 2020;Bishop et al, 2022). We conduct a first order analysis of topographic diffraction and propagation effects using the Finite Difference Time Domain code infraFDTD by Kim and Lees (2011).…”
Section: Topographic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%