2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2006.254803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Efficiency and Fairness for Opportunistic Round Robin Scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…JFI is bounded between zero and one, where zero means total unfairness and one means total fairness. It should be noted that total unfairness will occur when we have an infinite number of user and one user dominates over all the resources [77].…”
Section: Time Slot Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…JFI is bounded between zero and one, where zero means total unfairness and one means total fairness. It should be noted that total unfairness will occur when we have an infinite number of user and one user dominates over all the resources [77].…”
Section: Time Slot Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time slots are assigned opportunistically such that the users will be assigned the time slots that maximizes the total throughput within a frame [77]. The ORR algorithm works as follows.…”
Section: Opportunistic Round Robin (Orr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common approach to obtain higher QoS in the network is to have a fairer resource allocation among the users [4,5]. One widely adopted fair scheduling policy is the Proportional Fair Scheduling (PFS) algorithm [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is of great importance to incorporate different schedulers into the analysis and do so in a unified manner that enables them to be compared. While an opportunistic RR scheduler [11], and a proportional fair scheduler [12], [13], [14], which achieves a balance between fairness and system throughput, have been analyzed, this has been done only for a single-cell system with Rayleigh fading and no CCI [11], [13], [14]. While [15] did consider the effect of multi-tier interference and different schedulers, its analysis assumes that the throughput directly equals the signal to interference ratio (SIR) at the receiver; this makes its results applicable only to systems in which the SIR at each mobile station is very small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%