2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral derivative feature coding for hyperspectral signature analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The four compared methods are as follows: BC [ 26 ], SFBC [ 29 ], SDFC [ 25 ] and CF [ 13 ]. According to the experiments in [ 13 ], M = 20, s = 20 are validated as the optimal settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The four compared methods are as follows: BC [ 26 ], SFBC [ 29 ], SDFC [ 25 ] and CF [ 13 ]. According to the experiments in [ 13 ], M = 20, s = 20 are validated as the optimal settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, two general approaches have been investigated for hyperspectral signature characterization [ 25 ]. The first is a coding-based approach, which encodes spectral signatures as code words.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Robles-Kelly, C.P.Huynh, Imaging Spectroscopy for Scene Analysis, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-4652-0_7, © Springer-Verlag London 2013 89Chang et al (2009) developed a coding scheme for the spectral variation of hyperspectral signatures by means of spectral derivatives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%