Spectral characterization and impact of stepwise ablation protocol including LAA electrical isolation on persistent AF

Abstract

Objectives To study how left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) impacts atrial dominant frequency (DF) in patients with long‐standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF). Background LAAEI is associated with a high probability of freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) and spectral analysis may identify high‐frequency sources. How LAAEI impacts the AF dynamics and the subgroup of LSPAF patients in whom LAAEI would be most beneficial, is unclear. Methods Twenty patients with LSPAF were included in the study. Fast Fourier transforms (FFT) were performed on atrial electrograms recorded from 13 sites in the LA and RA. The highest peak frequency was defined as DF. Results There was no significant difference in DF between atrial sites except for at the superior vena cava which had the lowest DF at baseline. Stepwise ablation consisting of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and a linear ablation set of mitral isthmus and roof significantly reduced the DF within the coronary sinus (CS) (5.93 ± 0.98 Hz vs. 5.09 ± 0.72 Hz, p < .05) and the LA posterior wall (LApos) (6.26 ± 0.92 Hz vs. 5.43 ± 0.98 Hz, p < .01). LAAEI preferentially further decreased the DF at the LApos (p < .01), but not at the CS. In cases where there was < 13.6% reduction in the DF of the LApos following the stepwise ablation, the addition of LAAEI was associated with an increased restoration of sinus rhythm (55%, p < .05). Conclusion LAAEI in addition to stepwise ablation results in further reduction of the DF in the LApos, which is associated with acute termination of AF and favorable ablation outcome.

Dynamics of Intraprocedural Dominant Frequency Identifies Ablation Outcome in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

“…It has been shown that the clinical efficacy of a stepwise catheter ablation (step-CA) is associated with a decrease in AF complexity as indicated by changes in the dominant frequency (DF) of AF (Lemola et al, 2006;Johner et al, 2020;Ma et al, 2021). However, whether the time-course of AF organization throughout an ablation may serve as an indicator of the efficacy of the procedure remains to be determined.…”