2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral and timing evolution of MAXI J1631–479 during the 2018–19 outburst with NICER

Abstract: The X-ray transient MAXI J1631–479 went into outburst on 2018 December 21 and remained active for about seven months. Owing to various constraints it was monitored by NICER only during the decay phase of the outburst for about four months. The NICER observations were primarily in the soft state with a brief excursion to the hard intermediate state. While the soft state spectrum was dominated by thermal disk emission, the hard intermediate state spectrum had maximum contribution from the thermal Comptonization.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the intermediate states (HIMS and SIMS), the rms spectra are generally characterised with two slopes along with the peak appearing at certain energy band (Gierliński & Zdziarski 2005). The observed rms spectra (in present work) are similar to that generally observed in the intermediate state (Gierliński & Zdziarski 2005;Shaposhnikov et al 2010;Rout et al 2021).…”
Section: Spectral State Transitionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the intermediate states (HIMS and SIMS), the rms spectra are generally characterised with two slopes along with the peak appearing at certain energy band (Gierliński & Zdziarski 2005). The observed rms spectra (in present work) are similar to that generally observed in the intermediate state (Gierliński & Zdziarski 2005;Shaposhnikov et al 2010;Rout et al 2021).…”
Section: Spectral State Transitionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…NICER started monitoring this source on MJD 58498 (obsID 1200500101) when it was already in the soft state, and caught a transition back to the HIMS on MJD 58506 (obsID 1200500110; Van den Eijnden et al 2019). The source stayed in the HIMS until MJD 58545 (obsID 2200500102), after which NICER had a visibility gap and the source was already back to the soft state when the monitoring resumed on MJD 58560 (obsID 2200500108; Rout et al 2021). As no NICER data is available in the hard state, all the good groups we find are in the HIMS, and the results for one representative group is shown in Figure A5.…”
Section: A3 Maxi J1535-571mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NICER started monitoring this source on MJD 58498 (obsID 1200500101) when it was already in the soft state, and caught a transition back to the HIMS on MJD 58506 (obsID 1200500110;van den Eijnden et al 2019). The source stayed in the HIMS until MJD 58545 (obsID 2200500102), after which NICER had a visibility gap and the source was already back to the soft state when the monitoring resumed on MJD 58560 (obsID 2200500108; Rout et al 2021). As no NICER data is available in the hard state, all the good groups we find are in the HIMS, and the results for one representative group is shown in Fig.…”
Section: A3 Maxi J1535-571mentioning
confidence: 87%