2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral and photometric evolution of young stellar populations: The impact of gaseous emission at various metallicities

Abstract: Abstract. We include gaseous continuum and line emission into our  models for the spectral and photometric evolution of Simple Stellar Populations (SSPs) for various metallicities in the range 0.02 ≤ Z/Z ≤ 2.5. This allows to extend them to significantly younger ages than before. They now cover the age range from 4 Myr all through 14 Gyr. We point out the very important contributions of gaseous emission to broad band fluxes and their strong metallicity dependence during very early evolutionary stages of s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
444
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
22
444
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bicker & Fritze-v. Alvensleben 2005). It has been shown to have a large impact, even on broad band luminosities and colors, during strong starbursts by Krüger et al (1995) (see also Anders & Fritze-v. Alvensleben 2003).…”
Section: Undisturbed Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bicker & Fritze-v. Alvensleben 2005). It has been shown to have a large impact, even on broad band luminosities and colors, during strong starbursts by Krüger et al (1995) (see also Anders & Fritze-v. Alvensleben 2003).…”
Section: Undisturbed Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Non-zero Lyman continuum escape fraction will reduce the strength of optical nebular emission lines (see Inoue 2011 andSalmon et al 2015). We then use the tabulated line ratios between Hβ and the metal lines from Anders & Alvensleben (2003) to calculate the metal line fluxes for a metallicity of 0.2Z e . For templates with dust attenuation, we include the dust attenuation effects after adding nebular emission lines.…”
Section: Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Following this relation, we derived EW(Hα) for all considered redshifts. We also derived EWs for Hβ assuming case B recombination and the corresponding EWs for [O III] and [O II] by using the line ratios tabulated in Anders & Fritze-v. Alvensleben (2003). We Redshift distribution of the three galaxy samples considered in this work: a galaxy sample with spectroscopic redshifts in the GOODS-S field (filled gray; sample 1), a galaxy sample with well-established CANDELS photometric redshifts, also in GOODS-S (red line; sample 2), and a sample of simulated galaxies with known input redshifts (dashed line; sample 3).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%