2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3466777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral analysis of line edge and line-width roughness with long-range correlation

Abstract: Large-scale integrations (LSIs) are facing an ever-growing problem of device variability. One of the origins that cause the variability is line-width roughness (LWR) caused by line edge roughness (LER). Accurate characterization of the LWR plays an essential role in controlling the LWR. To do this, we report a methodology, named the “assembly method,” that enables to analyze LWR statistics beyond the conventional correlation length limit, basing on the previous “patchwork” method and recent discrete power spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To extract the noise level of the CD-SEM, we have recently developed a method, 13 based on the PSD fitting method proposed by Hiraiwa et al 10,11,14,15 It consists of acquiring a large set of CD-SEM images (N Ã ) of a line in order to calculate a PSD (PSD) of the line LWR. The final PSD is the average of the N Ã calculated PSD.…”
Section: Lwr Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract the noise level of the CD-SEM, we have recently developed a method, 13 based on the PSD fitting method proposed by Hiraiwa et al 10,11,14,15 It consists of acquiring a large set of CD-SEM images (N Ã ) of a line in order to calculate a PSD (PSD) of the line LWR. The final PSD is the average of the N Ã calculated PSD.…”
Section: Lwr Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] In this study we investigated the latter, because the former is not suitable for analyzing multi-component LWR 16) such as that observed in our samples. 17) In the analyses using the PSD, we usually fit theoretical PSDs to an experimental one and estimate LWR statistics as the values used in the best fitting. The problem with previous PSD methods was that the theoretical PSDs were calculated using a formula that was derived by assuming widths obtained continuously with infinitely long lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formula has been further revised to permit a long correlation length, well beyond the conventional analysis limit. 17) Although our methods accurately analyze the LER/LWR of photoresist lines, they cannot be applied to actual patterns, which are formed through processing steps, such as plasma etching, that introduce a smoothing effect. [18][19][20][21] The purpose of this work is to provide a method for analyzing the smoothed LWRs on the basis of the aforementioned discrete PSD method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the actual PSD is achieved when N approaches infinity and the expected value can be obtained accurately. In real world cases, the number of real measurement samples is finite hence averaging PSD over many trials is necessary to more accurately estimate the underlying physical process: 29 , 30 PSD(f)=limNinf (Δd)2(2N+1)Δd|n=NNxnei2πfnΔd|2.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14) 31 33 σintrinsic refers to the stochasticity of LER profiles caused by process variation, σmetrology is the measurement uncertainty introduced by metrology algorithm and in our case influenced by IQ, σextrinsic refers to extrinsic noise contributions from factors such as SEM shot noise, SEM tool stage movement, and beam profile. Unbiasing could be used to remove high frequency extrinsic noise and the results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%