Recent Developments in Multivariate and Random Matrix Analysis 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56773-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Analysis of Large Reflexive Generalized Inverse and Moore-Penrose Inverse Matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For c > 2 the Moore-Penrose approximation is not reliable anymore. We observe a similar behavior for other structures of the covariance matric n and the mean vector μ n , which indicates that the results are robust and justifies the theoretical findings of Bodnar and Parolya (2020) for the optimal shrinkage intensity given in (2.32). Figure 2 provides further numerical results related to the comparison of the two optimal shrinkage intensities.…”
Section: Estimation Of Unknown Parameters Bona Fide Estimatorsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For c > 2 the Moore-Penrose approximation is not reliable anymore. We observe a similar behavior for other structures of the covariance matric n and the mean vector μ n , which indicates that the results are robust and justifies the theoretical findings of Bodnar and Parolya (2020) for the optimal shrinkage intensity given in (2.32). Figure 2 provides further numerical results related to the comparison of the two optimal shrinkage intensities.…”
Section: Estimation Of Unknown Parameters Bona Fide Estimatorsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Next, we investigate the quality of this approximation in general case without imposing restrictions on n . This issue was studied for other quantities involving S * n and S + n in detail by Bodnar and Parolya (2020), who compare the limiting spectral distributions of S * n and S + n by deriving the limits for their corresponding Stieltjes transforms. It is concluded that the two inverses behave completely different in general.…”
Section: Estimation Of Unknown Parameters Bona Fide Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and The results of Theorem II.6 are derived by approximating the Moore-Penrose inverse with the reflexive inverse (see, e.g., Cook and Forzani [51]), which provides a good approximation of the Moore-Penrose inverse when c i ∈ (1, 2) (see, Bodnar and Parolya [52]). In this case, the dynamic shrinkage estimator of the GMV portfolio (II.32)-(II.34) is expected to perform good in practice, while for larger values of c i it should be used with caution.…”
Section: Dynamic Gmv Portfolio For Singular Sample Covariance Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%