2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.96.063011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral analysis of gravitational waves from binary neutron star merger remnants

Abstract: In this work we analyze the gravitational wave signal from hyper-massive neutron stars formed after the merger of binary neutron star systems, focusing on its spectral features. The gravitational waves signal are extracted from numerical relativity simulations of models already considered in [1][2][3], and allow us to study the effect of the total baryonic mass of such systems (from 2.4M to 3M ), the mass ratio (up to q = 0.77) and the neutron star equation of state, both in equal and highly unequal mass binar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
7
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…InFig.1, we show the emitted energy-density in the gravitational waves channel, on the right side, in order to allow a comparison of results with the EoS displayed on the left side. In such a demonstrative case, we have assumed the mass of the two Neutron Stars to be equal to each other 2 .Our numerical results are in agreement with the large numerical GR literature dedicated on Neutron Stars Merging -see e.g [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…InFig.1, we show the emitted energy-density in the gravitational waves channel, on the right side, in order to allow a comparison of results with the EoS displayed on the left side. In such a demonstrative case, we have assumed the mass of the two Neutron Stars to be equal to each other 2 .Our numerical results are in agreement with the large numerical GR literature dedicated on Neutron Stars Merging -see e.g [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…We also plot the f peak −R 1.6 fit obtained in [70], confirming that our simulations follow the empirical (EoS-insensitive) relation. Regarding subdominant peaks in the spectrum, we note that they can be generated by different physical mechanisms and that the strength of these different peaks can vary with the binary masses and the EoS [33,41,42,44,48,67,68,95] (see [44,68] for a unified picture of the postmerger dynamics and GW emission). In what follows and for the purposes on this study we do not distinguish between the different origin of subdominant features and define f sub as the frequency of the second highest peak with a frequency at least 400Hz below f peak .…”
Section: Simulated Post-merger Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time of merging and the time of the collapse to a black hole are indicated by vertical, dotted red lines. For details on the numerical extraction of the GW signal see [59,65,79].…”
Section: A Matter Dynamics and Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%