2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11005-006-0088-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectra of Schrödinger Operators on Equilateral Quantum Graphs

Abstract: We consider magnetic Schrödinger operators on quantum graphs with identical edges. The spectral problem for the quantum graph is reduced to the discrete magnetic Laplacian on the underlying combinatorial graph and a certain Hill operator. In particular, it is shown that the spectrum on the quantum graph is the preimage of the combinatorial spectrum under a certain entire function. Using this correspondence we show that that the number of gaps in the spectrum of the Schrödinger operators admits an estimate from… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof, however, contains an element which allows one to bypass the need for symmetry (lemma 4.4) which is required in the proof of theorem 4.2, and thus gives the possibility to generalize this result to non-Neumann graphs and graphs with potentials. It was shown in [54] that theorem 2.3 holds also for δ-type conditions and for some electric potentials, if the the inverse Hill discriminant is used instead of the arccos. Therefore, one might try to repeat the proof above, replacing the arccos with the corresponding inverse Hill discriminant.…”
Section: Discretized Versions Of a Metric Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof, however, contains an element which allows one to bypass the need for symmetry (lemma 4.4) which is required in the proof of theorem 4.2, and thus gives the possibility to generalize this result to non-Neumann graphs and graphs with potentials. It was shown in [54] that theorem 2.3 holds also for δ-type conditions and for some electric potentials, if the the inverse Hill discriminant is used instead of the arccos. Therefore, one might try to repeat the proof above, replacing the arccos with the corresponding inverse Hill discriminant.…”
Section: Discretized Versions Of a Metric Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relation between quantum and combinatorial graph operators is well known and has been exploited many times (e.g., [1,5,8,34,35,39,50]). …”
Section: Then λ Is In the Spectrum Of The Graphene Hamiltonian H If Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This derivation was triggered by the one done in [36] for the photonic crystal case, as well by [2,3], albeit the presented computation is simpler and more convenient for our purpose than the one in [36]. It reflects the known idea (e.g., [1,5,34,35,50]) that spectral analysis of quantum graph Hamiltonians (at least on graphs with all edges of equal lengths) splits into two essentially unrelated parts: analysis on a single edge, and then spectral analysis on the combinatorial graph, the former being independent on the graph structure, and the latter independent on the potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Magnetic Hamiltonians on quantum graphs were studied e.g. in [Pan06,GG08,BW14,Ber13,EM15,Exn97,Kur11,EL11]. In this review, attention is paid to magnetic quantum graphs in Section 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%