Abstract:We present a phenomenological and numerical study of strong Alfvénic turbulence in a magnetically dominated collisionless relativistic plasma with a strong background magnetic field. In contrast with the nonrelativistic case, the energy in such turbulence is contained in magnetic and electric fluctuations. We argue that such turbulence is analogous to turbulence in a strongly magnetized nonrelativistic plasma in the regime of broken quasi-neutrality. Our 2D particle-in-cell numerical simulations of turbulence … Show more
“…Of this, relativistic turbulence has indeed been found guilty, provided it was stirred up with δB ∼ B 0 (Zhdankin et al 2017;Comisso & Sironi 2018). The most recent spate of papers on this topic, which represent the state of the art and from which the historical paper trail can be followed, are Comisso & Sironi (2021), Vega et al (2022b); Vega, Boldyrev & Roytershteyn (2022a), Hankla et al (2022) (imbalanced turbulence), Nättilä & Beloborodov (2022) (small δB/B 0 , no non-thermal acceleration), Zhdankin, Uzdensky & Kunz (2021) (non-unity mass ratio, ion vs. electron heating), and Chernoglazov, Ripperda & Philippov (2021) (alignment and current sheets in fluid but relativistic MHD turbulence). It is interesting that in this context again, reconnecting structures spontaneously generated by turbulence appear to play a prominent rolethis time as sites of particle acceleration.…”
Section: The Frontier: Kinetic Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent spate of papers on this topic, which represent the state of the art and from which the historical paper trail can be followed, are Comisso & Sironi (2021), Vega et al. (2022 b ); Vega, Boldyrev & Roytershteyn (2022 a ), Hankla et al. (2022) (imbalanced turbulence), Nättilä & Beloborodov (2022) (small , no non-thermal acceleration), Zhdankin, Uzdensky & Kunz (2021) (non-unity mass ratio, ion vs. electron heating), and Chernoglazov, Ripperda & Philippov (2021) (alignment and current sheets in fluid but relativistic MHD turbulence).…”
This review of scaling theories of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence aims to put the developments of the last few years in the context of the canonical time line (from Kolmogorov to Iroshnikov–Kraichnan to Goldreich–Sridhar to Boldyrev). It is argued that Beresnyak's (valid) objection that Boldyrev's alignment theory, at least in its original form, violates the Reduced-MHD rescaling symmetry can be reconciled with alignment if the latter is understood as an intermittency effect. Boldyrev's scalings, a version of which is recovered in this interpretation, and the concept of dynamic alignment (equivalently, local 3D anisotropy) are thus an example of a physical theory of intermittency in a turbulent system. The emergence of aligned structures naturally brings into play reconnection physics and thus the theory of MHD turbulence becomes intertwined with the physics of tearing, current-sheet disruption and plasmoid formation. Recent work on these subjects by Loureiro, Mallet et al. is reviewed and it is argued that we may, as a result, finally have a reasonably complete picture of the MHD turbulent cascade (forced, balanced, and in the presence of a strong mean field) all the way to the dissipation scale. This picture appears to reconcile Beresnyak's advocacy of the Kolmogorov scaling of the dissipation cutoff (as
$\mathrm {Re}^{3/4}$
) with Boldyrev's aligned cascade. It turns out also that these ideas open the door to some progress in understanding MHD turbulence without a mean field – MHD dynamo – whose saturated state is argued to be controlled by reconnection and to contain, at small scales, a tearing-mediated cascade similar to its strong-mean-field counterpart (this is a new result). On the margins of this core narrative, standard weak-MHD-turbulence theory is argued to require some adjustment – and a new scheme for such an adjustment is proposed – to take account of the determining part that a spontaneously emergent 2D condensate plays in mediating the Alfvén-wave cascade from a weakly interacting state to a strongly turbulent (critically balanced) one. This completes the picture of the MHD cascade at large scales. A number of outstanding issues are surveyed: imbalanced turbulence (for which a new, tentative theory is proposed), residual energy, MHD turbulence at subviscous scales, and decaying MHD turbulence (where there has been dramatic progress recently, and reconnection again turned out to feature prominently). Finally, it is argued that the natural direction of research is now away from the fluid MHD theory and into kinetic territory – and then, possibly, back again. The review lays no claim to objectivity or completeness, focusing on topics and views that the author finds most appealing at the present moment.
“…Of this, relativistic turbulence has indeed been found guilty, provided it was stirred up with δB ∼ B 0 (Zhdankin et al 2017;Comisso & Sironi 2018). The most recent spate of papers on this topic, which represent the state of the art and from which the historical paper trail can be followed, are Comisso & Sironi (2021), Vega et al (2022b); Vega, Boldyrev & Roytershteyn (2022a), Hankla et al (2022) (imbalanced turbulence), Nättilä & Beloborodov (2022) (small δB/B 0 , no non-thermal acceleration), Zhdankin, Uzdensky & Kunz (2021) (non-unity mass ratio, ion vs. electron heating), and Chernoglazov, Ripperda & Philippov (2021) (alignment and current sheets in fluid but relativistic MHD turbulence). It is interesting that in this context again, reconnecting structures spontaneously generated by turbulence appear to play a prominent rolethis time as sites of particle acceleration.…”
Section: The Frontier: Kinetic Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent spate of papers on this topic, which represent the state of the art and from which the historical paper trail can be followed, are Comisso & Sironi (2021), Vega et al. (2022 b ); Vega, Boldyrev & Roytershteyn (2022 a ), Hankla et al. (2022) (imbalanced turbulence), Nättilä & Beloborodov (2022) (small , no non-thermal acceleration), Zhdankin, Uzdensky & Kunz (2021) (non-unity mass ratio, ion vs. electron heating), and Chernoglazov, Ripperda & Philippov (2021) (alignment and current sheets in fluid but relativistic MHD turbulence).…”
This review of scaling theories of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence aims to put the developments of the last few years in the context of the canonical time line (from Kolmogorov to Iroshnikov–Kraichnan to Goldreich–Sridhar to Boldyrev). It is argued that Beresnyak's (valid) objection that Boldyrev's alignment theory, at least in its original form, violates the Reduced-MHD rescaling symmetry can be reconciled with alignment if the latter is understood as an intermittency effect. Boldyrev's scalings, a version of which is recovered in this interpretation, and the concept of dynamic alignment (equivalently, local 3D anisotropy) are thus an example of a physical theory of intermittency in a turbulent system. The emergence of aligned structures naturally brings into play reconnection physics and thus the theory of MHD turbulence becomes intertwined with the physics of tearing, current-sheet disruption and plasmoid formation. Recent work on these subjects by Loureiro, Mallet et al. is reviewed and it is argued that we may, as a result, finally have a reasonably complete picture of the MHD turbulent cascade (forced, balanced, and in the presence of a strong mean field) all the way to the dissipation scale. This picture appears to reconcile Beresnyak's advocacy of the Kolmogorov scaling of the dissipation cutoff (as
$\mathrm {Re}^{3/4}$
) with Boldyrev's aligned cascade. It turns out also that these ideas open the door to some progress in understanding MHD turbulence without a mean field – MHD dynamo – whose saturated state is argued to be controlled by reconnection and to contain, at small scales, a tearing-mediated cascade similar to its strong-mean-field counterpart (this is a new result). On the margins of this core narrative, standard weak-MHD-turbulence theory is argued to require some adjustment – and a new scheme for such an adjustment is proposed – to take account of the determining part that a spontaneously emergent 2D condensate plays in mediating the Alfvén-wave cascade from a weakly interacting state to a strongly turbulent (critically balanced) one. This completes the picture of the MHD cascade at large scales. A number of outstanding issues are surveyed: imbalanced turbulence (for which a new, tentative theory is proposed), residual energy, MHD turbulence at subviscous scales, and decaying MHD turbulence (where there has been dramatic progress recently, and reconnection again turned out to feature prominently). Finally, it is argued that the natural direction of research is now away from the fluid MHD theory and into kinetic territory – and then, possibly, back again. The review lays no claim to objectivity or completeness, focusing on topics and views that the author finds most appealing at the present moment.
“…Recently, attention has been drawn to particle acceleration by turbulence and specifically, magnetically dominated turbulence, which may provide a complementary or alternative mechanism to previously studied acceleration processes (Zhdankin et al 2017(Zhdankin et al , 2018a(Zhdankin et al ,b, 2019(Zhdankin et al , 2021Comisso & Sironi 2018, 2021, 2022Wong et al 2020;Nättilä & Beloborodov 2021, 2022Trotta et al 2020;Vega et al 2022a;Bresci et al 2022). Kinetic numerical simulations indicate that turbulence accelerates particles to ultra-relativistic energies, with powerlaw energy distribution functions.…”
In a collisionless plasma, the energy distribution function of plasma particles can be strongly affected by turbulence. In particular, it can develop a nonthermal power-law tail at high energies. We argue that turbulence with initially relativistically strong magnetic perturbations (magnetization parameter σ ≫ 1) quickly evolves into a state with ultrarelativistic plasma temperature but mildly relativistic turbulent fluctuations. We present a phenomenological and numerical study suggesting that in this case, the exponent α in the power-law particle-energy distribution function, f(γ)d
γ ∝ γ
−α
d
γ, depends on magnetic compressibility of turbulence. Our analytic prediction for the scaling exponent α is in good agreement with the numerical results.
“…Recently, attention has been drawn to particle acceleration by turbulence and specifically, magnetically dominated turbulence, which may provide a complementary or alternative mechanism to previously studied acceleration processes (Zhdankin et al 2017(Zhdankin et al , 2018a(Zhdankin et al , 2018bComisso & Sironi 2018Zhdankin et al 2019;Trotta et al 2020;Wong et al 2020;Comisso & Sironi 2021;Nättilä & Beloborodov 2021;Zhdankin et al 2021;Vega et al 2022a;Comisso & Sironi 2022;Bresci et al 2022;Nättilä & Beloborodov 2022). Kinetic numerical simulations indicate that turbulence accelerates particles to ultrarelativistic energies, with power-law energy distribution functions.…”
Relativistic magnetically dominated turbulence is an efficient engine for particle acceleration in a collisionless plasma. Ultrarelativistic particles accelerated by interactions with turbulent fluctuations form nonthermal power-law distribution functions in the momentum (or energy) space, f(γ)d
γ ∝ γ
−α
d
γ, where γ is the Lorenz factor. We argue that in addition to exhibiting non-Gaussian distributions over energies, particles energized by relativistic turbulence also become highly intermittent in space. Based on particle-in-cell numerical simulations and phenomenological modeling, we propose that the bulk plasma density has lognormal statistics, while the density of the accelerated particles, n, has a power-law distribution function,
P
(
n
)
dn
∝
n
−
β
dn
. We argue that the scaling exponents are related as β ≈ α + 1, which is broadly consistent with numerical simulations. Non-space-filling, intermittent distributions of plasma density and energy fluctuations may have implications for plasma heating and for radiation produced by relativistic turbulence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.